From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-04-28 00:53:09
|
It will take me a while to digest your proposal. I don't see the meat of it (how it could possibly work) at the moment. At first blush, this looks like my original proposal, which was that the MC would push all the metadata to the AspectManager, but we decided against that solution because 1) it would require the MC understanding all the point cut expressions, etc. i.e. understanding the cross cutting. 2) users can still deploy using jboss-aop.xml which the MC wouldn't know about. Instead, we decided on the query approach where the MC asks the AOP layer "what would it mean if I created an instance of this object" during the describe stage. Correct me if I have misunderstood. anonymous wrote : | This is going to require a bunch of refactoring to MC because currently the classadapter is hidden by BeanInfos. | I don't mind refactoring, especially if it simplifies the problem. I don't see why the ClassAdapter inside the BeanInfo creates a problem. The BeanInfo is just a description of the class after AOP has played with it and it is per ClassAdapter (which could be instance level) not per Class. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3875688#3875688 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3875688 |