RE: [JBoss-dev] What is actually using aop in 4.0.x currently

[Scott M S. <sco...@jb...>]

Ok, I'll assign the issue to Kabir then.

-----Original Message-----
From: jbo...@li...
[mailto:jbo...@li...] On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 6:02 PM
To: jbo...@li...; Kabir Khan
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is actually using aop in 4.0.x currently

I'll have Kabir patch and release AOP 1.3.3 for 4.x branch adding all=20
SerialVersion UID.

AOP 1.3.x is stable.  Has been for awhile.  I think 2.0 will be as well.




Scott M Stark wrote:
> Obviously the ejb3 work does, but is the bean deployer as well? Adrian

> has a serialVersionUID issue:
>=20
> =20
>=20
> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1907
>=20
> =20
>=20
> which relates to the=20
> org.jboss.test.compatibility.test.SerialVersionUIDUnitTestCase which=20
> validates superfluous changes in serialVersionUIDs across minor jboss=20
> versions. Currently the test ignores all aop classes:
>=20
> =20
>=20
>          /* Ignore the aop package for 4.0.1 since this will be in
flux=20
> until
>=20
>             jboss5/ejb3 is stablized
>=20
>          */
>=20
>          "org.jboss.aop",
>=20
> =20
>=20
> Is the aop layer sufficiently stabilized that a commitment to serial=20
> version compatibility can be maintained in 4.0.x going forward?
>=20
> =20
>=20

--=20
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBo...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development