|
From: <gal...@jb...> - 2006-07-03 12:22:56
|
That is indeed true. However, let's say the method looked something like this: | public byte[] createPersistentState(byte[] inMemoryState, FQN root) | The current CacheLoaders would just need to return the result of loadState(root) or loadEntireState() depending on the number of elements in the root node. The main problem I see is that even if you only wanted to generate the persistent state, you'd require to parse the in-memory state as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955026#3955026 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955026 |