[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Two Transition Definitions

[<tom...@jb...>]

aha.  you are absolutely right and i misinterpreted your request initially.  

what your saying make absolute sense.  thanks for being persistent !

here's some ways of we could add support for what you want.

* add conditions on the transitions.  there is one catch to it: how to resolve the variables that are used in the condition.  We could only resolve to the variables in the subprocess, only resolve the vars in the super process.  Or maybe we could resolve first in the sub process and then in the superprocess.  Would that make sense ?

* add an expression to the process-state that resolves to the name of the leaving transition to take.

Maybe we could strive to support both (exclusive) options...

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3953939#3953939

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3953939