From: <ben...@jb...> - 2006-06-22 23:31:54
|
Brian, let's discuss this more 1-to-1. The two issues listed in the Jira that you mentioned seems to me are all related to get bypassing the interceptor stack, am I correct? Yes, I am doing that exactly for optimization. During the profiling (for LOCAL mode), http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-574, I have found that local get/put is still expensive because it needs to go through the interceptor stack (specially Tx and Lock). This is especially the case since during each putObject call where there are many get/set. However, the idea is that we go through the interceptor stack only once to obtain lock, then the rest of get ops should be in purely "local" mode. Now, we are still fine with get/set under putObject wrt BR. So only problem is for getObject during failover, right? If this were the case, then either your proposal will work. Or, in getObject() call, we have a specific call to bring over the data. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952836#3952836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952836 |