[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: PojoCache 2.0 Interface

[<ben...@jb...>]

Another thing that I want to point out is that now we don't require to specify a Fqn that is associated directly with the underlying Cache. Instead, a String id is required.

This has pros and cons that I can see:

Cons - Since we still map Id internally to Fqn, if the id is without separator, e.g., "/justThis", then concurrency is not optimial since everything works from the root. As a result, we need to ask the user to have separator in the Id string. Not very natural.

Pros - It decouples from the Fqn of which is more accurate since a user should only cares about the Id of the Pojo. Semantically, this is a much better one.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952226#3952226

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952226