[Jboss-svn-commits] JBL Code SVN: r4634 - in labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval: . archive

[<jbo...@li...>]

Author: mic...@jb...
Date: 2006-06-06 02:01:22 -0400 (Tue, 06 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 4634

Modified:
   labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/approval.drl
   labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/archive/raw.drl
Log:
got rid of bad newlines

Modified: labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/approval.drl
===================================================================
--- labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/approval.drl	2006-06-06 05:03:43 UTC (rev 4633)
+++ labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/approval.drl	2006-06-06 06:01:22 UTC (rev 4634)
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 rule "Driver has had too many accidents"
 	
 	when 
-		Driver has had more than 3 prior claims		
+		Driver has had more than 3 prior claims				
 	then 
 		Reject Policy with explanation : 'Too many accidents'
 		
@@ -27,32 +27,34 @@
 end
 
 rule "Driver is in marginal age" 	
- 	#remember, don't leave any blank lines in between expressions
+ 	#remember, don't leave any blank lines in between expressions
 	when
-		Driver is between 18 and 24 years old		
+		Driver is between 18 and 24 years old		
 		Driver has had more than 1 prior claims
-		Policy type is 'COMPREHENSIVE'
-	then
-		Reject Policy with explanation : 'No accidents allowed if in marginal age group'
+		Policy type is 'COMPREHENSIVE'
+	then
+		Reject Policy with explanation : 'No accidents allowed if in marginal age group'
 end
 
-rule "Driver in unsafe area for marginal age"
-	when
-		Policy type is 'COMPREHENSIVE'	
+rule "Driver in unsafe area for marginal age"
+	when
+		Policy type is 'COMPREHENSIVE'	
 		Driver is less than 25 years old
-		Driver has a location risk profile of 'HIGH'		
-	then
-		Reject Policy with explanation : 'Marginal age driver in high risk area'		
+		Driver has a location risk profile of 'HIGH'
+				
+	then
+		Reject Policy with explanation : 'Marginal age driver in high risk area'		
 end
 
-rule "Driver in unsafe area with priors"
-	when
+rule "Driver in unsafe area with priors"
+	when
 		Driver has a location risk profile of 'MED'
 		Policy type is 'COMPREHENSIVE'
 		Driver is less than 25 years old
-		Driver has had more than 1 prior claims
-	then
-		Reject Policy with explanation : 'Driver in that area is too risky - given past accidents and age.'
+		Driver has had more than 1 prior claims
+		
+	then
+		Reject Policy with explanation : 'Driver in that area is too risky - given past accidents and age.'
 end
 
 rule "Driver unsafe for third party"

Modified: labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/archive/raw.drl
===================================================================
--- labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/archive/raw.drl	2006-06-06 05:03:43 UTC (rev 4633)
+++ labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/training/developers-course/lab-4-rule-formats/src/rules/approval/archive/raw.drl	2006-06-06 06:01:22 UTC (rev 4634)
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 #created on: 23/05/2006
 package org.acme.insurance
 
-
+import org.acme.insurance.Approve
+ 
 rule "Driver underage"
 	
 	when
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@
 		d : Driver(locationRiskProfile == "MED")
 		d : Driver(priorClaims > 1)
 		d : Driver(age < 25)
-		Policy(type == "COMPREHENSIVE")					
+		Policy(type == "COMPREHENSIVE")		 			
 	then
 		assert(new Rejection("Driver in that area is too risky - given past accidents and age."));
 end
@@ -52,7 +53,10 @@
 	then
 		assert(new Rejection("Too many priors for third party"));
 end
-
+   
+   
+   
+   
 rule "Driver in bad area for theft"
 
 	when 
@@ -60,37 +64,38 @@
 		d : Driver(locationRiskProfile == "HIGH")
 	then
 		assert(new Rejection("Unsafe area for theft"));
-end
+end 
 
-rule "Quick approval - safe driver, any policy type"
-	when
+rule "Quick approval - safe driver, any policy type"
+	when
 		not Rejection()
 		d: Driver(age >= 30)
 		d: Driver(priorClaims == 0)
-	then
-		assert(new Approve("Driver is safe, and mature"));
+	then
+		assert(new Approve("Driver is safe, and mature"));
 end
 
-rule "Approve policy affirmative"
-	salience 100 #this can short circuit any processing
-	when
+rule "Approve policy affirmative"
+	salience 100 #this can short circuit any processing
+	when
 		a : Approve()
-		p : Policy()
-	then
+		p : Policy()
+				  
+	then
 		p.setApproved(true);
 		System.out.println("APPROVED: " 
 								+ a.getReason());
-		drools.clearAgenda(); #stop processing (bit of a hack ;)
+		drools.clearAgenda(); #stop processing (bit of a hack ;)
 end
 
-rule "Approve if not rejected"
+rule "Approve if not rejected"
 	salience -100 #approve if there are no objections
-	when
+	when
 		not Rejection() 
-		p : Policy(approved == false)
+		p : Policy(approved == false)
 	then
-		System.out.println("APPROVED: due to no objections."); 
-		p.setApproved(true);
+		System.out.println("APPROVED: due to no objections."); 
+		p.setApproved(true);
 end
 
 rule "Reject application"