From: <jbo...@li...> - 2006-06-06 02:29:40
|
Author: mic...@jb... Date: 2006-06-04 20:57:35 -0400 (Sun, 04 Jun 2006) New Revision: 4601 Modified: labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Engine/Section-Why_use_a_Rule_Engine.xml Log: removed bad para tag Modified: labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Engine/Section-Why_use_a_Rule_Engine.xml =================================================================== --- labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Engine/Section-Why_use_a_Rule_Engine.xml 2006-06-04 19:00:33 UTC (rev 4600) +++ labs/jbossrules/trunk/documentation/manual/en/Chapter-Rule_Engine/Section-Why_use_a_Rule_Engine.xml 2006-06-05 00:57:35 UTC (rev 4601) @@ -213,9 +213,9 @@ to use a rule engine.</para> <para>Alternatives are script-based engines that provide the dynamicness - for "changes on the fly" (there are many solutions here) or</para> + for "changes on the fly" (there are many solutions here). </para> - <para>Process engines (also capable of workflow) such as jBPM allow you to + <para>Alternatively Process engines (also capable of workflow) such as jBPM allow you to graphically (or programmatically) describe steps in a process - those steps can also involve decision point which are in themselves a simple rule. Process engines and rules often can work nicely together, so its not |