jboss-dev-forums

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBCACHE-399

[<ben...@jb...>]

I have discover some additional issues that are tracked here:

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-676
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-110
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-675

While 110 and 676 are the problems that I told you before.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954572#3954572

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954572

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBCACHE-399

[ScottMarlowNovell <do-...@jb...>]

To resolve JBCACHE-675, should we conform to our new requirement that Map keys be serialiable? Or do you want me to revert the requirement that keys be serializable?

Should we allow Map keys that are PojoCacheable?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954638#3954638

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954638

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBCACHE-399

[<ben...@jb...>]

Scott, I have made a comment in 675 and 676. Before 110 can be resolved by JBoss Aop, I propose we simply require a key needs to be Serializable but not PojoCacheable. This way, we bypass the recursion problem in the test case.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955386#3955386

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955386