jboss-dev-forums

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossXB] - Re: Mapping attributes with default values

[<sco...@jb...>]

The answer is yes, its available via the XSAttributeUse.getConstraintValue, which for the attributes in the schema shown in the JBXB-32 issue are:


  |   Attr(type): , Required: false, ConstraintType: default, ConstraintValue: java.lang.String
  |   Attr(editor): , Required: false, ConstraintType: none, ConstraintValue: null
  |   Attr(replace): , Required: false, ConstraintType: default, ConstraintValue: true
  |   Attr(trim): , Required: false, ConstraintType: default, ConstraintValue: true
  | 

Currently it looks like we are throwing this info away in the call to XsdBinder.bindAttributes. I think this is something that needs to be implemented for the 4.0.3 release so I'll look into it while Alexey is out.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884856#3884856

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884856

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossXB] - Re: Mapping attributes with default values

[<sco...@jb...>]

I have added support for mapping missing attributes with defaults to head, and the org.jboss.test.xml.jbxb.defaults.DefaultsUnitTestCase is passing, but the org.jboss.test.xml.JNDIBindingUnitTestCase continues to fail because the java object stack and type stacks seem to be out of synch when it comes to the JNDIBinding object and associated jndi:binding element.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3885639#3885639

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3885639

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossXB] - Re: Mapping attributes with default values

[<sco...@jb...>]

This is now working in head. After discussing some of the current behavior and getting it clear and documented this will be ported to 4.0 for the 4.0.3 release.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3885785#3885785

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3885785