jboss-dev-forums

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Adding support for dependencies on jmx kernel beans to t

[<sco...@jb...>]

A related discussion:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=64876


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954164#3954164

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954164

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Adding support for dependencies on jmx kernel beans to t

[<ad...@jb...>]

I already discussed this Thomas and you pointed to the
thread where we discussed in more detail.

In the 4.0.4 MC deployer there is no link between beans
and mbeans. It is the deployment (an MBean) that takes
part in jmx dependencies.

The only way to satisfy a dependency would be to add
a "kludge" to the MC deployment descriptor (or use an
alternate dds) that lets you express


  | <deployment>
  |    <jmx-depends>jboss:server=something</jmx-depends>
  | 

which would then get added to the MC deployment's MBean.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954325#3954325

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954325

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Adding support for dependencies on jmx kernel beans to t

[<sco...@jb...>]

Ok, it does not look like this should require a new mc release to be able to augment the BeanSchemaBinding to support this. I'm thinking its just an extended SchemaBinding that has a wrapper root object to combine the mc metadata and adds another namespace and ObjectFactory for the jmx-depends list so as not to introduce non-mc metadata into the BeanSchemaBinding.

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3353

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954475#3954475

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954475