So related to:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1997
There simply is no consistent notion of stopping a deployment as opposed to undeploying it. I have fixed the module type issue, and what happens now in the org.jboss.test.deployment.DeploymentTestCase.testListStartStopModules is that stopping the ear results in undeployment of the ejb and war modules, but does nothing to the ear deployment. The undeployment of the war/ejb do not result in removal of the jsr77 mbeans because the notification listener does not expect that a stop event equates to undeployment.
Attempting to start the ear after this therefore results in error regarding duplicate jsr77 mbeans, and there is also a problem starting the war as the deployer cannot go from the stop state to the start state:
| Caused by: javax.security.jacc.PolicyContextException: Operation not allowed
| at org.jboss.security.jacc.JBossPolicyConfiguration.validateState(JBossP
| olicyConfiguration.java:201)
| at org.jboss.security.jacc.JBossPolicyConfiguration.linkConfiguration(JB
| ossPolicyConfiguration.java:160)
| at org.jboss.web.AbstractWebDeployer.start(AbstractWebDeployer.java:347)
|
| ... 96 more
| Caused by: org.jboss.util.state.IllegalTransitionException: No transition for ac
| tion: linkConfiguration from state:inService
| at org.jboss.util.state.StateMachine.nextState(StateMachine.java:111)
| at org.jboss.security.jacc.JBossPolicyConfiguration.validateState(JBossP
| olicyConfiguration.java:196)
|
In general, I don't see that we have a meaningful implementation of start/stop for our deployers based on MainDeployer ops. Until they are rewritten with these states in mind, there is no meaningful mapping of the DeploymentManager.start/stop operations.
The alternative is to write a jsr88 facade to the MainDeployer that explicitly honors the distiction between distribution and starting, stopping and removal.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3887389#3887389
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3887389
|
