My prob lem is not so much that you have changed tack to provide
a more pragmatic implementation, nor that you are iterating a solution.
My problem is that you are creating interfaces that cannot survive all the requirements
we have down the road.
I would prefer a solution that looks like it will meet the requirements (even if it doesn't actually work - it can be fixed) to one where we are going to incompatibly break things
to do the more complicated stuff in future releases.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3875655#3875655
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3875655
|