jboss-dev-forums

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<be...@jb...>]

No objections your honor

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883634#3883634

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883634

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<man...@jb...>]

The court ruling shall hold then, defendant Bela.  :)



View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883637#3883637

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883637

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<cle...@jb...>]

Please... make sure that the build.xml from the testsuite still working after your refactoring ;-)


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883680#3883680

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883680

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<ben...@jb...>]

That is true to reduce publicly accessible methods. But we want to make sure that the classes are not accidentally bundled into the source package. E.g., under aop, there are pojos like Payload and Person that are not test cases but helper classes instead.

-Ben

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883695#3883695

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883695

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<man...@jb...>]

Ok, tests have been repackaged accordingly, it should allow for removal of unnecessary public methods in API classes which are only used for testing in future refactoring.  Please sync up your tests dir.  

Oh, and ignore all unit test failures in org.jboss.cache.optimistic ... :)  This is still incomplete!

Do let me know if you have any probs with this new structure.

Cheers,
Manik

PS: Ben, I'll double-check the ant script, but I do believe nothing under the test dir is bundled into the src package.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884147#3884147

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884147

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<man...@jb...>]

I've also noticed that org.jboss.cache.transaction.DeadlockTest
 (used to be org.jboss.cache.tests.transaction.DeadlockTest) still fails?

Is this a known issue, the failures are testConcurrentUpgrade and testMoreThanOneUpgrader?


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884153#3884153

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884153

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<be...@jb...>]

Yes, this is a known issue

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884158#3884158

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884158

[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBossCache] - Re: Functional unit tests in JBossCache codebase

[<ben...@jb...>]

Maink,

I don't expect we have accidentally bundled it into our package now. We just need to be aware of it.

-Ben

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3884256#3884256

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3884256