You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(157) |
May
(789) |
Jun
(608) |
Jul
(554) |
Aug
(868) |
Sep
(654) |
Oct
(994) |
Nov
(803) |
Dec
(982) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
(1006) |
Feb
(1054) |
Mar
(1345) |
Apr
(1305) |
May
(1392) |
Jun
(1016) |
Jul
(265) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(19) |
2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(13) |
2008 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(51) |
2009 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(10) |
2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(27) |
2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(79) |
Dec
(45) |
2013 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(12) |
2014 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
2015 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
2017 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <rya...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 16:24:36
|
Ok, so let me try to make this concrete to see if I understand. 1. Only direct dependencies are stored in the toplevel build (eg. jms1.1) 2. A developer can call the "materialize" target to traverse all the component-infos and generate a materialized-versions.xml. If there are conflicts, they will need to be resolved manually. This file is not source controlled, it is a product of the build. 3. Once conflicts are resolved, this file can then be copied to a source controlled file, versions.xml. This file effectively pegs components at specific versions. So usually, a developer will just check out this file and not worry about the above process. 4. We have an additional target "versions-report" which compares the materialized versions to the pegged versions. Cruisecontrol calls this at the end of each build and includes the results in the build email: Error: log4j is pegged at 1.2.8, but aop (1.0.2) is compatable with log4j 1.2.6, 1.2.7 or 1.2.9. Warning: log4j is pegged at 1.2.8, but cache (1.2.30), remoting (1.1.3) are also compatible with 1.2.9. So this emailed report would trigger the discussion and would then be resolved by a developer starting with step #1. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878406#3878406 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878406 |
From: <roy...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 16:15:28
|
Elliot, please email me your setup.ddl and setup.sql. I have oracle10g running locally, and am not entirely convinced that the hibernate schema output is correct - seems to break in Toad when I run it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878405#3878405 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878405 |
From: wobbet <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 16:13:07
|
I've gotten the mail server so that it will reliably deliver messages to local mailboxes but when I try to specify a recipient that isn't on the local machine I get rcpt to: <mya...@gm...> 550 Not Authorized What have I not properly configured? Is this a remote delivery config option that I'm missing? rjsjr View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878404#3878404 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878404 |
From: hengels <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 14:32:54
|
I made a really strange observation. If I instrument the class as part of some list of classes, it might fail. If I instrument it separately or as part of a different list of classes, it succeeds !?!?!? Event if it's the same set of classes, it migh succed, if specified in one order but fails, if specified in the another order. for example: aopc.sh $CP -aoppath etc/instrument-aop.xml classes/wilken/informationssystem/berichtswesen classes/wilken/informationssystem/dimension -> fails aopc.sh $CP -aoppath etc/instrument-aop.xml classes/wilken/informationssystem/dimension classes/wilken/informationssystem/berichtswesen -> succeeds BTW: I fixed another bug in javaassist http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=64091 .. I hope somebody will apply the patches. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878387#3878387 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878387 |
From: erubinsky <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 13:54:26
|
Here are the insert statements: insert into jbp_users (jbp_uid, jbp_uname, jbp_password, jbp_realemail, jbp_regdate, jbp_viewrealemail, jbp_enabled) values ('1', 'admin', '21232f297a57a5a743894a0e4a801fc3', 'po...@ex...', SYSDATE, '1', '1'); insert into jbp_users (jbp_uid, jbp_uname, jbp_password, jbp_realemail, jbp_regdate, jbp_viewrealemail, jbp_enabled) values ('2', 'user', 'ee11cbb19052e40b07aac0ca060c23ee', 'po...@ex...', SYSDATE, '1', '1'); insert into jbp_roles (jbp_rid, jbp_name, jbp_displayname) values ('1', 'Admins', 'Administrators'); insert into jbp_roles (jbp_rid, jbp_name, jbp_displayname) values ('2', 'Users', 'Users'); insert into jbp_role_membership (jbp_uid, jbp_rid) values ('1', '1'); insert into jbp_role_membership (jbp_uid, jbp_rid) values ('2', '2'); I also added the following rows based on another post: INSERT INTO JBP_USER_PREF_SET ( JBP_ID, JBP_PARENT_ID, NAME ) VALUES ( 1, NULL, 'AdminPrefs'); INSERT INTO JBP_USER_PREF_SET ( JBP_ID, JBP_PARENT_ID, NAME ) VALUES ( 2, NULL, 'UserPrefs'); I noticed that constraints in Oracle have a "validate" option. Could this be the culprit? Elliot View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878377#3878377 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878377 |
From: jeffreymark <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 13:44:02
|
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I can't get Eclipse configured where it will user Jboss as the web services runtime (and not AXIS) so I can attempt to debug a web service running in Jboss. Is this possible (Use the Jboss Eclipse IDE to debug a web service running in Jboss), if yes how do you do it. Thanks in advance. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878374#3878374 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878374 |
From: klpd <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 13:14:29
|
I have a struts application deployes on JBOSS 3.2.2. The server is running. When I try to access the application from another PC , it says page cannot be found whereas I can access the application sitting at the server. I have tried pinging the server from the other PC and it pings fine. Second when I try to deploy the same application on another PC with JBOSS installed and running, it gives EJB specification error. Anybody please help????? Regards, Thomas John View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878371#3878371 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878371 |
From: hengels <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 12:17:42
|
the following patches fix the problem: --- javassist-3.0/src/main/javassist/preproc/Compiler.java 2005-01-18 15:53:48.000000000 +0100 | +++ javassist-3.0_patched/src/main/javassist/preproc/Compiler.java 2005-05-19 12:07:20.038916592 +0200 | @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ | throws IOException | { | int c = skipSpaces(reader, ' '); | - while ('A' <= c && c <= 'Z' || 'a' <= c && c <= 'z' | - || '0' <= c && c <= '9' || c == '.' || c == '_') { | + while (Character.isJavaIdentifierPart((char)c)) { | buf.append((char)c); | c = reader.read(); | } --- javassist-3.0/src/main/javassist/compiler/Lex.java 2005-01-18 15:53:48.000000000 +0100 | +++ javassist-3.0_patched/src/main/javassist/compiler/Lex.java 2005-05-19 13:09:20.419332800 +0200 | @@ -133,8 +133,7 @@ | return readSeparator('.'); | } | } | - else if ('A' <= c && c <= 'Z' || 'a' <= c && c <= 'z' || c == '_' | - || c == '$') | + else if (Character.isJavaIdentifierStart((char)c)) | return readIdentifier(c, token); | else | return readSeparator(c); | @@ -434,8 +433,7 @@ | do { | tbuf.append((char)c); | c = getc(); | - } while ('A' <= c && c <= 'Z' || 'a' <= c && c <= 'z' || c == '_' | - || c == '$' || '0' <= c && c <= '9'); | + } while (Character.isJavaIdentifierPart((char)c)); | | ungetc(c); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878368#3878368 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878368 |
From: itsabhijit <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 12:08:29
|
hi I have situation where the RAR file structure is as follows connector.jar connector-ds.xml meta-inf/ra.xml This connector.jar classes needs classes from other utility jar files which talks to my messaging bus.(proprietery messaging product). Right we are including all the necessary jar files under server classpath and re-start JBOSS 3.2.6. Is there any way where I can specify these jar files in classpath so that connector gets all these necessary jar files. So that without re-starting the server I can make these jar files available to my resource adapter. I tried packaging the jar files in RAR , modifying the class-path entry of manifest.mf of both rar and inside jar. It doesnot seem to be working. I would be extremelly thankful if some one could point better solution for this. thanks a lot abhijit View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878364#3878364 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878364 |
From: itsabhijit <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 12:04:34
|
hi I have situation where the RAR file structure is as follows connector.jar connector-ds.xml meta-inf/ra.xml This connector.jar classes needs classes from other utility jar files which talks to my messaging bus.(proprietery messaging product). Right we are including all the necessary jar files under server classpath and re-start JBOSS 3.2.6. Is there any way where I can specify these jar files in classpath so that connector gets all these necessary jar files. I tried packaging the jar files in RAR , modifying the class-path entry of manifest.mf of both rar and inside jar. It doesnot seem to be working. I would be extremelly thankful if some one could point better solution for this. thanks a lot abhijit View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878363#3878363 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878363 |
From: Masoud_Omidvar <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 08:29:02
|
Please check JBoss-IDE installation. Use JBossIDE-1.5M1-EJB3.zip. Add here your error log, please. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878330#3878330 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878330 |
From: hengels <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 06:56:42
|
When trying to lookup "wilken$informationssystem$dimension$DerivativeFaktenBerechner$berechneFakten$aop", the MemberResolver iterates over the following methods and doesn't find it: [0] = "<init> ()V" | [1] = "berechneFakten ()Z" | [2] = "berechneFakten (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)Z" | [3] = "berechneFakten (Lwilken/informationssystem/dimension/Faktenspezifikation;)Z" | [4] = "finalizeProcess ()Z" | [5] = "finalizeProcessImmediate ()V" | [6] = "anlegeWertErmitllern (Lwilken/informationssystem/util/parser/faktenspezifikation/SimpleNode;)Z" | [7] = "anlegenDimensionsElemente ()Z" | [8] = "anlegeElemente (ILwilken/informationssystem/dimension/DimensionsRaumElement;)Z" | [9] = "leseElemente (I)Z" | [10] = "formelBerechnen (Lwilken/informationssystem/util/parser/faktenspezifikation/SimpleNode;)Ljava/math/BigDecimal;" | [11] = "ermittleWert (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/math/BigDecimal;" | [12] = "erfasseWert (Ljava/math/BigDecimal;)Z" | [13] = "prefeElementExistiertinDatenPool (Lwilken/informationssystem/hierarchie/ArbeitsHierarchieElement;)Z" | [14] = "<clinit> ()V" | [15] = "_getAdvisor ()Lorg/jboss/aop/Advisor;" | [16] = "_getInstanceAdvisor ()Lorg/jboss/aop/InstanceAdvisor;" | [17] = "_setInstanceAdvisor (Lorg/jboss/aop/InstanceAdvisor;)V" | [18] = "berechneFakten ()Z" Please note that index 1 and 18 have the same name and signature and there's really no method with the long name (original body). Thus the MemberResolver behaves correct. Afterwards, the MemberResolver recursively calls lookupMethod withe the superclass and so on. Finally it returns null and the caller (TypeChecker->atMethodCallCore) throws a CompileError. My suspicion is, that renaming the original method in MethodExecutionTransformer->optimized fails (method.setName(wrappedName);). And later, during compilation of the wrapper method, the compiler cannot find the original method with the long name, because it was not renamed correctly. Do you think, this is the possible reason? anonymous wrote : Does it always fall over at the same method? Does cleaning out all your classfiles between change the behaviour at all? How many classes are you weaving? If I run the aopc with the same preconditions (fresh classfiles, same include set), it fails always at the same method. Though this is not the only method. If I try to instrument different classes, the same error occures in other places, too. I'm weaving a small subset from more than 16000 classes, linked again heavy jars. Holger View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878315#3878315 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878315 |
From: hengels <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 06:54:08
|
Please, can anyone comment on this? Is this possibly a bug? Can you please check the grammar, if valid (from the java language perspective) identifiers with non-usascii characters are tokenized correctly? Thanks, Holger View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878313#3878313 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878313 |
From: PeterJ <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-19 01:10:57
|
As promised, more code has been committed to CVS to support managing destinations. The code now interacts with JMX, and uses the deployment service. Thus, when you start up the admin console, you will see the several default queues and topics, and any queues or topics you create or edit will be persisted. Comments on the user interface are still welcome. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878292#3878292 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878292 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 23:01:19
|
The problem with pegging a version in the top level build is that the components will move forward to later versions while the top level build remains on an old version. There is a conflict here: 1) You need the pegging to communicate how a conflict is being resolved to other developers. 2) You need the pegging at release time to unambigously describe the release. 3) You also need to be aware that it needs unpegging later. 4) You can later change the release to record that although it was originally tested with log4j-1.2.8, it also works just as well with 1.2.9 This was my argument against holding versions in the build files and instead recording which artificats have been tested twith which versions of a dependency. Who is going to (or even knows when) a version should be unpegged. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878283#3878283 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878283 |
From: <roy...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 21:44:29
|
Did you guys modify the Hibernate dialect in the config file? Also, can you post the insert statements from the setup.sql that you used? The ones generated in the build are tailored for mysql. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878279#3878279 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878279 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 21:34:14
|
"tom...@jb..." wrote : | 2) pointer or resource (docs or code) about how "All deployments can see global classes" would be great. Also starting-pointers for writing deployers would be great. | This is classloading 101 JVM-CLASSPATH JBOSS-BOOTSTRAP-CLASSLOADER (NoAnnotationURLClassLoader) DEFAULT_LOADER_REPOSITORY SCOPED_LOADER_REPOSITORY By default classloading can only look upwards. i.e. stuff in the default or a scoped loader repository can see everything in the default loader repository. e.g. a scoped war can see ejb classes or jboss system classes To make it work the other way around you need to be given a classloader, either from the DeploymentInfo or the Thread's ContextClassLoader. e.g. JBoss deployers can only process scoped deployments because it keeps a reference to the classloader in the deployment's DeploymentInfo, or at runtime it sets the application's classlaoder as the TCL. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878278#3878278 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878278 |
From: mhaerdi <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 21:29:46
|
up View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878277#3878277 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878277 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 21:27:40
|
"tom...@jb..." wrote : 1) yes, all i want is to configure a hibernate SessionFactory. but if i understand correctly, the HARDeployer will scan the .har for mapping files. I don't want an automatic scan. So i want to create a JbpmDeployer similar to HARDeployer. But the configuration of the hibernate SessionFactory is done on the basis of a hibernate.cfg.xml file instead of scanning. | | makes sense ? | Then change the HAR deployer such that it supports both push and pull. .har can then pull (discover) the config .jbpm can push (be explicit about) the config to use View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878275#3878275 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878275 |
From: <rya...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 21:16:14
|
"ad...@jb..." wrote : | 1) Who is reponsible for the versions used | a) the top level buld | b) the component | c) something else | The solution we've discussed elsewhere is that a graph of dependencies should be built based on the union of dependencies from each component. So: 1. Components define their version compatibilities 2. The toplevel build chooses the version acceptable to all components? 3. It also seems we have a requirement for the toplevel build to "peg" a component at a given version. For instance log4j as above, and of course any directly referenced components such as jms. anonymous wrote : | 2) How are conflicts resolved | a) by changing the top level build | b) by changing the offending component | c) other | There are 2 kinds of conflicts: 1. Conflicts which occur during synchronization. That is, that two components can not agree on a depedency's version -- preventing synchronization from completing (Or would a conflict not prevent synchronization?). In this case, you could either resolve it by modifying one of the components to be more agreeable (ie, test it with the new version). Or you could "peg" the toplevel build to a given version of that dependency, which would remove the ambiguity? 2. Conflicts that occur during materialization. This would produce warnings if a component is incompatible with a pegged version of another component, as a result of #1. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878269#3878269 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878269 |
From: erubinsky <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 20:53:00
|
I have seen the same error using the AS 4.0.1sp1 binary with Portal 2.0 RC1 source. Any help is appreciated. Elliot View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878266#3878266 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878266 |
From: <tom...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 20:25:38
|
1) yes, all i want is to configure a hibernate SessionFactory. but if i understand correctly, the HARDeployer will scan the .har for mapping files. I don't want an automatic scan. So i want to create a JbpmDeployer similar to HARDeployer. But the configuration of the hibernate SessionFactory is done on the basis of a hibernate.cfg.xml file instead of scanning. makes sense ? 2) pointer or resource (docs or code) about how "All deployments can see global classes" would be great. Also starting-pointers for writing deployers would be great. regards, tom. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878264#3878264 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878264 |
From: mikek753 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 18:43:31
|
Hello, what I'm missing and how I can make it work? I can't put breakpoint by double-click in the marker bar of an editor. I can only do it by open the marker bar (vertical ruler) pop-up menu and select Toggle Breakpoint. Is that Eclipse problem? thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878254#3878254 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878254 |
From: <kab...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 18:16:40
|
There is only one MethodInfo per _original_ method. Its job is to keep track of the interceptors/advices for the method, and to link the original method to the wrapper method. Does it always fall over at the same method? Does cleaning out all your classfiles between change the behaviour at all? How many classes are you weaving? etc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878249#3878249 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878249 |
From: hengels <nu...@jb...> - 2005-05-18 17:05:51
|
Yes, a new method with the long name has been created and added. After adding the methods, they get renamed. However, if I browse the parameter clazz of the method "optimized", I see two methodInfos in CtClass->classFile with the original name and none with the long name. Maybe renaming of the method doesn't propagate to the CtClass->classFile correctly? .. unfortnately I have to leave the office for today View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3878247#3878247 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3878247 |