You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(157) |
May
(789) |
Jun
(608) |
Jul
(554) |
Aug
(868) |
Sep
(654) |
Oct
(994) |
Nov
(803) |
Dec
(982) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
(1006) |
Feb
(1054) |
Mar
(1345) |
Apr
(1305) |
May
(1392) |
Jun
(1016) |
Jul
(265) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(19) |
2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(13) |
2008 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(51) |
2009 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(10) |
2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(27) |
2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(79) |
Dec
(45) |
2013 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(12) |
2014 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
2015 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
2017 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 15:16:45
|
Yes. Send out an email to the dev list so everyone is aware. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888188#3888188 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888188 |
From: darras77 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 14:07:10
|
Hello, I'm using Xdoclet for generate my EJB file (interface local et remote), and descriptor file. Currently, i have 40 EJB, i need two minutes to generate this file. it is possible to generate that a part of my EJB ? Thks for your help FRANCK View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888181#3888181 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888181 |
From: <rl...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 13:27:22
|
Now that the build for the 4.0 branch has been deployed I am looking at my roadmap. The next item in my queue is to port the thirdparty build to head. Is this in line with everyone's expectations? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888173#3888173 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888173 |
From: <tho...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 09:45:39
|
Here some feedback for jbossws-tools.xsd -r 1.6 1. General 1.1. The file should have a version identifier in the name 1.2. Readablility could be vastly improved by avoiding anonymous types. Use named complex types and reference them appropraitely. 1.3. Please care about better readability. Space and comments are cheap. 2. global configuration 2.1. global configuration should be at the top 2.2. override is a property that pertains to the filesystem like output dir, etc. It should not be part of the xml config. A commandline option is more appropriate 2.3. retainSourceFiles can never be false because we don't compile. This can be removed. 3. javaToWSDL 3.1 documentation is too restrictive 3.2. attribute endpointInterface is a bad name. It can also be an annotated endpoint impl class. 3.3. attribute oneWayOperations is too restrictive. In future we might have more options that are scoped on the method. Use a sequence of operation elements + a oneWay attribute 4. wsdlToJava 4.1 be consistent with naming. WSDL vs. wsdl 4.2 How do you specify the wsdlURL? 5. javaToXSD 5.1 Why do we need to configure this? Is this not part of javaToWSDL, which also defines a types namespace. 6. xsdToJava 6.1 Why do we need to configure this? Is this not part of wsdlToJava. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888136#3888136 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888136 |
From: t.titi14 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 09:05:37
|
Hello, I'm looking for a tutorial to write a simply EntityBean CMP with eclipse 3.1, Jboss server 4.02 and JbossEclipseIDE 1.5M2 pluggin. I don't know how to write it, generate xdoclet, .... If everyone have a tutorial thanks to give me the url for it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888124#3888124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888124 |
From: antzcp04 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 08:17:45
|
Hi Again. Basically i am looking for a requirement wherein user interfaces are dynamic depending on the user needs. User's are able to change the column or it's display, its sorting, labels and buttons. Possible per Client requirement and if possible per user ( workstation user). I was thinking of creating a template...of that matter... again many thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888117#3888117 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888117 |
From: antzcp04 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 07:41:23
|
Hi there again, I have read to some forums that Jboss wont be developing newer upgrades and version for Jboss Nukes. Is this true? Also is the Jboss Portlets the upgarded version of Jboss Nukes. Jboss Portlets = CMS ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888115#3888115 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888115 |
From: antzcp04 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 07:17:51
|
Hi There , I am currently researching on a CMS that I can use for our company and i was considering magnolia or Jboss Nukes. Since we are considering to use EJB as part of our architectural plan, I was thinking of using Jboss, and also i would assume that Nukes would be supported tremendously, with a larger support community. I would like to know though as to why in the Jboss.org or Jboss.com website, there is no discussion or advertisement of the Jboss Product View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888110#3888110 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888110 |
From: <ani...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 06:41:19
|
AFAIK, WSIF allows you to create an Invocation object while passing a wsdl file. When the whole standardized webservices paradigm in J2EE provides you this capability, use it. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888106#3888106 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888106 |
From: kukeltje <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 06:36:39
|
"ani...@jb..." wrote : * AFAIK, WSIF is a dead project. Sure? Oracle seems to rely heavily on it in their BPEL implementation to achieve optimization so e.g. ejb's or pojo's can be called from bpel without making a real webservice. But hey, if they want to bet on a dead horse. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888104#3888104 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888104 |
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 05:03:38
|
XML to Object back to XML is pointless. If there is not a usable object based metamodel then its not going to work. It seems like this is something to think about going forward as this is where everything else is going. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888096#3888096 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888096 |
From: <ste...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 04:48:02
|
Well the Hibernate Configuration only accepts meta-data in a limited number of ways, all of which boil down to expecting some form of xml. So basically we'd be having jbossxb do the transformation from xml into a HibernateMapping[], and then transforming each HibernateMapping back to XML to pass to the Hibernate Configuration. Or am I missing something? I guess we could do something like Emmanuel is doing for the annotations. He extends the Configuration to plug in a new annotation-based Binder (which is the thing which interprets the incoming meta-data). Not to mention that maintaining the DTD is hard enough without having to duplicate stuff over to a schema. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888095#3888095 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888095 |
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 04:18:15
|
What about a multi-session embedded mode. The Mappings attribute would be an HibernateMapping[] array object (something you may need to create) that is umarshalled from the xml based on the jbossxb schema mappings applied in the hibernate-mapping-3.0.xsd: | <mbean code="org.jboss.hibernate.har.HARDeployer" name="jboss.har:service=HARDeployer"> | <attribute name="Mappings" serialDataType="jbxb"> | <hbm:mappings | xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | xmlns:hbm="urn:jboss:hibernate-mapping" | xs:schemaLocation="urn:jboss:hibernate-mapping hibernate-mapping-3.0.xsd" | > | <hibernate-mapping package="org.jboss.test.hibernate.model"> | | <!-- there is no "Edit Role" function, so map Role as an immutable class --> | <class name="Role" table="t_role" mutable="false"> | | <!-- there are few roles, and they are not updated so cache them --> | <cache usage="read-only"/> | | <id name="id" type="long" unsaved-value="null"> | <generator class="increment"/> | </id> | | <property name="name" unique="true" not-null="true" update="false" length="25"/> | <property name="description" length="150"/> | <property name="timeOfCreation" update="false" not-null="true"/> | | <!-- | this is the "inverse" association of the User.userRoles collection. This | mapping demonstrates that an "inverse" end of a many-to-many does not need | to be the same type of collection mapping as the other end! | --> | <bag name="users" lazy="true" table="t_user_role" inverse="true" order-by="timeOfCreation asc"> | <!-- the foreign key of the Role --> | <key column="role_id"/> | <!-- the foreign key of the User --> | <many-to-many column="user_id" class="User" outer-join="true"/> | <!-- Since Users are not cached, make sure we use an outer join! --> | </bag> | | </class> | | | | <!-- A named HQL query. This uses a subquery, so it won't | work on MySQL! --> | | <query name="unassignedRolesByUser.HQL"> | <![CDATA[ | from Role role | where not :user in ( select u.id from role.users u ) | order by role.name desc | ]]> | </query> | | | <!-- For MySQL 4.0, which has no support for subselects, we | need to use an ON-clause condition which is not provided | by HQL. So we will use a named SQL query instead. --> | | <sql-query name="unassignedRolesByUser.MySQL"> | <![CDATA[ | select {rol.*} | from t_role rol | left join t_user_role ur | on ur.role = rol.id and ur.user = :user | where ur.id is null | order by rol.name desc | ]]> | <return alias="rol" class="Role"/> | <synchronize table="t_user_role"/> | </sql-query> | | | </hibernate-mapping> | <hibernate-mapping package="org.jboss.test.hibernate.model"> | | <class name="User" table="t_user"> | | <id name="id" type="long" unsaved-value="null"> | <generator class="increment"/> | </id> | | <!-- Use a timestamp for optimistic locking --> | <version name="timeOfLastUpdate" type="calendar"/> | | <!-- We don't change the handle, so map it with update="false". --> | <property name="handle" unique="true" not-null="true" update="false"/> | | <!-- password is a keyword in some databases, so quote it --> | <property name="password" column="`password`" not-null="true"/> | | <property name="email"/> | | <!-- We can't change the creation time, so map it with update="false". --> | <property name="timeOfCreation" update="false" not-null="true"/> | | <!-- Mapping for the component class Name --> | <component name="name"> | <property name="firstName"/> | <!-- initial is a keyword in some databases, so quote it --> | <property name="initial" column="`initial`"/> | <property name="lastName"/> | </component> | | <!-- | A many-to-many association modelled using a composite-element mapping | (this lets us keep track of the time of creation for the link. We use an | <idbag>, since that gives us a nice surrogate key. | --> | <idbag name="userRoles" lazy="true" table="t_user_role" order-by="timeOfCreation asc" cascade="save-update"> | <!-- the surrogate primary key --> | <collection-id column="id" type="long"> | <generator class="increment"/> | </collection-id> | <!-- the foreign key of the User --> | <key column="user"/> | <!-- | a composite-element holding the associated Role and User, and the | creation time of the link | --> | <composite-element class="UserRole"> | <!-- for convenience, a backpointer to the User --> | <parent name="user"/> | <!-- an "extra" column --> | <property name="timeOfCreation"/> | <!-- the foreign key of the Role --> | <many-to-one name="role" cascade="save-update" outer-join="false"/> | <!-- since Roles are cached, disable outerjoining! --> | </composite-element> | </idbag> | | <!-- | Usually, when we access the user's roles, we don't care about the creation | time of the link, etc. - we just want the roles themselves. So we map | another collection to the same table. This demonstrates how inverse="true" | can be used for purposes other than modelling a bi-directional association! | --> | <bag name="roles" lazy="true" table="t_user_role" inverse="true" order-by="timeOfCreation asc" cascade="save-update" batch-size="9"> | <!-- we access this collection often, so cache it. --> | <cache usage="transactional"/> | <!-- the foreign key of the User --> | <key column="user_id"/> | <!-- the foreign key of the Role --> | <many-to-many column="role_id" class="Role" outer-join="false"/> | <!-- since Roles are cached, disable outerjoining! --> | </bag> | | <!-- | A simple collection of values. This collection table has a composite | primary key consisting of the user and password columns. | --> | <set name="previousPasswords" table="t_old_passwords" lazy="true"> | <!-- the foreign key of the User--> | <key column="user_id"/> | <!-- the element (of value type) --> | <element type="string" column="pswd"/> | </set> | | </class> | | </hibernate-mapping> | </hbm:mappings> | </attribute> | </mbean> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888090#3888090 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888090 |
From: <bil...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 03:32:46
|
Would it be possible to add a shutdown method to Kernel so that there is an easy way to undeploy everything? Or is there already one? (don't want to save and iterate through all KernelDeployments) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888084#3888084 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888084 |
From: <ani...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 03:20:53
|
I have had the same thoughts for sometime. I will migrate the XSModel implementation from Xerces team to be engulfed in the JBossXSModel implementation. This will take some time. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888083#3888083 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888083 |
From: <ani...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 03:07:22
|
* AFAIK, WSIF is a dead project. * JaxWS is about interoperable webservices. The stress will be on document style web services. There will be support for rpc/literal style too. * Beauty of Jax-WS will be annotating your endpoint implementation with JSR181 annotations and the container will take care of the deployment. As I said earlier, I was merely suggesting. Dynamic configuration should be possible. Unless I know more about the requirements of jBPM project, I cannot say more. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888078#3888078 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888078 |
From: <ste...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 02:41:36
|
I'll have a think through this "registration" bit for the admin console. Seems easy enough, though. For the deployer bit, here's what I have done so far (which I think is enough to remove the deployer...): 1) Added code similiar to what Adrian posted regarding grabbing the classloader and "scanning it" for mappings. One additional thing I want to look at here is possibly using the new getDeploymentInfo() method Scott mentions and using getDeploymentInfo().ucl instead of Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader() to drive that. Maybe unfounded, but I am worried about start() coming from a source that perhaps does not go through the ServiceController. 2) Based on the new getDeploymentInfo() method, I internalized all the logic that used to be in HARDeployer.accepts() into the Hibernate MBean startService() method. It uses that to attempt to determine a "HarUrl". 3) The MBean is now capable of operating in essentially two modes. The first mode kicks in if the deployment was determined to be a HAR (see #2). Otherwise, it uses the code discussed in #1 to scan the classpath looking for mappings. 4) added a new attribute "scanForMappingsEnabled" which is used in "har deployment mode" to enable the classpath scanning logic even in that mode (in addition to using the HarUrl as a mapping source). I think all this combined covers all the functionality we wanted to see here. Using "har deployment mode", users can continue to use .har archives (see below) to create "segmented" multi-SessionFactory deployments. Using "non-har deployment mode", users can simply include a service descriptor defining a Hibernate MBean that will then scan the deployment's classpath for mappings. All without the need for the HARDeployer. I still need to register ".har" as an accepted SARDeployer extension. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888075#3888075 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888075 |
From: <aco...@jb...> - 2005-08-03 00:52:57
|
Okay everything is checked in. I need to do some doco and stuff but I consider that associated with doing doco and the release. There is also some minor "icons" and crap like that but I'll get that as part of the release as well. Mike, grab CVS and run the "dist" target. Also note that there is a new "dev" target and "dev-deploy". I included instructions inside of the build (regarding how to do dev builds). AFAIK this requires JBAS-4.0.3-rc2 (check out 40 branch from CVS) because I haven't tested with 4.0.2. One goal was to not have multiple editions of jboss-service.xml and hibernate-service.xml so now those are placeholders and there are only the templates. You must now run the dist build at least once and get the ones you want (configured how you like) then stick those in src/dev. The goal is to make sure the installer continues to work and not just one person maintains it and that it is kept consistent. There WOULD be a better way to do this if it weren't for the problem with automated builds. Mkunwrapped is now a non-public target (do ant -projecthelp, I added descriptions). Mike, I'd like your feedback in particular. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888073#3888073 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888073 |
From: <cle...@jb...> - 2005-08-02 21:56:00
|
There is two memory profilers at JbossProfiler: I - creations associated with methods II - Snapshots I - is what I call runtime profiler II - is what I call memory profiler For MemoryProfiler you will need Java5, for Runtime it doesn't matter. Did you find the documentation at the download page? I have added some information about it. Clebert View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888049#3888049 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888049 |
From: abitha <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-02 21:51:09
|
Are there any pre-requisites for using JBoss profiler? I am specifically looking to profile memory and code execution for my app -which is a clustered jboss 3.2.6 application running with jdk 1.4.2_07. Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888047#3888047 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888047 |
From: <koe...@jb...> - 2005-08-02 21:51:08
|
Couldn't we grab some ideas and maybe even code from the spider plugin of Beck and Gamma? This is kind of an object graph inspection tool for Eclipse. It inspects static object graphs, but I guess there are possible reuses there... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888046#3888046 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888046 |
From: kukeltje <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-02 21:43:31
|
See the roadmap in the jira: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888041#3888041 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888041 |
From: <cle...@jb...> - 2005-08-02 21:36:08
|
go to labs: http://labs.jboss.com Look for JBossProfiler at projects At the project specific portlet, look for downloads: You can use this URL also: http://labs.jboss.com/portal/index.html?ctrl:id=page.default.downloads&project=jbossprofiler View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888039#3888039 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888039 |
From: abitha <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-02 21:31:57
|
Hi - I am trying to download rc2 from the labs page, and I am not able to find it. I want to download it without going thru cvs. Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3888038#3888038 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3888038 |
From: jorge_tello5 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-08-02 21:27:55
|
Hi, My problem is: I got an Entity RolProcTrans (pk is codProceso, codTrans,tipoRol).=20 @Entity | @Table(name =3D "ROL_PROC_TRANS") | public class RolProcTrans implements Serializable { | =09private RolProcTransPK pk; | =09private RolTransaccion1 rolTransaccion1; |=20 | =09@ManyToOne | =09@JoinColumns( { | =09@JoinColumn(name =3D "COD_TRANS", insertable =3D false, updatable = =3D false), | =09@JoinColumn(name =3D "TIPO_ROL", insertable =3D false, updatable =3D= false) }) | =09public RolTransaccion1 getRolTransaccion1() { | =09=09return rolTransaccion1; | =09} |=20 | =09public void setRolTransaccion1(RolTransaccion1 rolTransaccion1) { | =09=09this.rolTransaccion1 =3D rolTransaccion1; | =09} |=20 | =09@Id(generate=3DGeneratorType.NONE) | =09 public RolProcTransPK getPk() { | =09 return pk; | =09 } | =09 | =09 public void setPk(RolProcTransPK pk) { | =09 this.pk =3D pk; | =09 } | } the pk class is: @Embeddable | public class RolProcTransPK implements Serializable { | =09private Long codProceso; | =09private String codTrans; | =09private Integer tipoRol; | ... and Entity RolTransaccion1 @Entity | @Table(name =3D "ROL_TRANSACCION_1") | public class RolTransaccion1 implements Serializable { | =09private String codEmpresa; | =09private RolTransaccion1PK pk; | =09private List<RolProcTrans> rolesProcTrans; |=20 | =09@OneToMany(fetch =3D FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy =3D "rolTransaccion1") | =09public List<RolProcTrans> getRolesProcTrans() { | =09=09return rolesProcTrans; | =09} |=20 | =09public void setRolesProcTrans(List<RolProcTrans> rolesProcTrans) { | =09=09this.rolesProcTrans =3D rolesProcTrans; | =09} |=20 | =09@Column(name =3D "COD_EMPRESA") | =09public String getCodEmpresa() { | =09=09return codEmpresa; | =09} |=20 | =09public void setCodEmpresa(String codEmpresa) { | =09=09this.codEmpresa =3D codEmpresa; | =09} |=20 | =09@Id(generate=3DGeneratorType.NONE) | =09public RolTransaccion1PK getPk() { | =09=09return pk; | =09} |=20 | =09public void setPk(RolTransaccion1PK pk) { | =09=09this.pk =3D pk; | =09} | } pk class=20 @Embeddable | public class RolTransaccion1PK implements Serializable { | =09private String codTrans; | =09private Integer tipoRol; | ... I=C2=B4m use SQL Server 2000 SP3. When I try list RolProcTrans Entity the error is: 16:13:38,623 ERROR [JDBCExceptionReporter] [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Drive= r for JDBC]Value can not be converted to requested type. I try, remove @ManyToOne relation and this function correctly What Happend? pleace some Idea. Thank you very much View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=3Dbb&op=3Dv= iewtopic&p=3D3888036#3888036 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=3Dbb&op=3Dpostin= g&mode=3Dreply&p=3D3888036 |