jboss-opentool-development Mailing List for JBoss JBuilder OpenTool (Page 2)
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
mredeker
Menu
▾
▴
jboss-opentool-development — Developing related list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|---|
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-07-12 16:19:38
|
Bugs item #565847, was opened at 2002-06-07 08:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=565847&group_id=46485 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Default tags in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml Initial Comment: If i add some default tags to the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file. The tags are removed every time i make a change in the ejb-module. Is it possible that my tags are not removed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Frederik Sauer (fredsa) Date: 2002-07-12 10:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=111914 The latest CVS code now inserts a comment in each of the generated deployment descriptors. The comments warn that you will lose your changes. I realize this in no way addresses the problem described here. It only serves to prevent you from having to find out the hard way. There are also some more useful pointers in the comments, specifically for generating datasource and datasource-mapping defaults in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-06-19 22:18 Message: Logged In: NO I noticed the same thing. the stuff in <defaults> </defaults> area is removed everytime you modify a bean in the EJBDesigner. Is it because the jbosscmp- jdbc.xml file is rebuilt when this happens. Currently, I just make a backup copy of jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file and replace the <defaults> before every build. Regardless, this tool saves lodes of time and effort, especially for building those ear files. Cheers to mredeker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=565847&group_id=46485 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-07-12 16:13:02
|
Bugs item #580056, was opened at 2002-07-11 05:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=580056&group_id=46485 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Johnson (johnsbrn) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: java.net.URL should have res-url tag Initial Comment: In Jboss 3.0, a java.net.URL resource should have a res-url tag instead of a jndi-name tag in the deployment descriptor. The following code change in generateResourceReferences appears to fix the problem: if ( iresref.getResType().equals("java.net.URL") ) { new XMLNode(xmlnode, "res-url", refJndiName ); } else if ( (idx !=-1) ) { new XMLNode(xmlnode, "jndi-name", refJndiName ); } else { new XMLNode(xmlnode, "jndi-name", refJndiName.startsWith("/") ? "java:" + refJndiName : "java:/" + refJndiName ); } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Frederik Sauer (fredsa) Date: 2002-07-12 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=111914 Thanks for the patch. Anyone know if res-url is valid for JBoss 2.4.x as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=580056&group_id=46485 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-07-11 11:57:23
|
Bugs item #580056, was opened at 2002-07-11 07:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=580056&group_id=46485 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Johnson (johnsbrn) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: java.net.URL should have res-url tag Initial Comment: In Jboss 3.0, a java.net.URL resource should have a res-url tag instead of a jndi-name tag in the deployment descriptor. The following code change in generateResourceReferences appears to fix the problem: if ( iresref.getResType().equals("java.net.URL") ) { new XMLNode(xmlnode, "res-url", refJndiName ); } else if ( (idx !=-1) ) { new XMLNode(xmlnode, "jndi-name", refJndiName ); } else { new XMLNode(xmlnode, "jndi-name", refJndiName.startsWith("/") ? "java:" + refJndiName : "java:/" + refJndiName ); } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=580056&group_id=46485 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-30 22:38:02
|
Bugs item #575345, was opened at 2002-06-29 14:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=575345&group_id=46485 Category: Interface (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Deleted Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Assigned to: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Summary: test for email Initial Comment: This is a test bug to see if the email sending is setup correct ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Date: 2002-06-30 11:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=455609 test the reply ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=575345&group_id=46485 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-30 09:54:20
|
Bugs item #575345, was opened at 2002-06-29 14:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=575345&group_id=46485 Category: Interface (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Assigned to: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Summary: test for email Initial Comment: This is a test bug to see if the email sending is setup correct ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Date: 2002-06-30 11:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=455609 test the reply ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=575345&group_id=46485 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-29 12:14:36
|
Bugs item #575345, was opened at 2002-06-29 14:14 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=575345&group_id=46485 Category: Interface (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Assigned to: Marcus Redeker (mredeker) Summary: test for email Initial Comment: This is a test bug to see if the email sending is setup correct ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=446294&aid=575345&group_id=46485 |
|
From: Marcus R. <mre...@we...> - 2002-03-02 17:42:13
|
The first final release of the Voyager JBoss OpenTool for JBuilder 6 Enterprise is available on sourceforge.net now!! Come and get: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss-opentool/ |
|
From: Marcus R. <mre...@we...> - 2002-02-25 23:03:02
|
I looked into it and figured that I use too many of JB6 specific classes and methods already. So there will be no support for JB5 from my side. Everybody else please feel free to give it a try. --Marcus |
|
From: Marcus R. <mre...@we...> - 2002-02-24 17:53:34
|
This is the fist message posted to the list. |
