Menu

#688 Errors reported but snipe works

open
4
2007-03-18
2005-07-14
No

Hi,

congratulations to 0.9.7.1, ist works well and I just
finished my first auction with this version with a
successful snipe. In the command line window I read:
---snip---
Thu Jul 14 21:52:34 CEST 2005: Thu Jul 14 21:52:34 CEST
2005: 7335350857 (Uhlenbrock digital R�ckmeldemodul
63340) - Executing snipe! (1)
Thu Jul 14 21:52:34 CEST 2005: Bidding €51.52 on 1
item[s] of (7335350857)-Uhlenbrock digital
R�ckmeldemodul 63340
Thu Jul 14 21:53:03 CEST 2005: Getting the sign in cookie.
Thu Jul 14 21:53:03 CEST 2005: Exception during the
check() operation of class AuctionsManager
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
ebayServer.handlePostBidBuyPage(ebayServer.java:1026)
at ebayServer.bid(ebayServer.java:1003)
at AuctionEntry.bid(AuctionEntry.java:1295)
at AuctionEntry.snipe(AuctionEntry.java:1192)
at Auctions.fireSnipe(Auctions.java:215)
at Auctions.doAllSnipes(Auctions.java:290)
at Auctions.check(Auctions.java:392)
at
AuctionsManager.checkAuctions(AuctionsManager.java:105)
at AuctionsManager.check(AuctionsManager.java:136)
at TimerHandler.run(TimerHandler.java:82)
Thu Jul 14 21:53:04 CEST 2005: Thu Jul 14 21:53:04 CEST
2005: 7335350857 (Uhlenbrock digital R�ckmeldemodul
63340) - Cancelling snipe, time is suddenly past
auction-end. (1)
Thu Jul 14 21:53:04 CEST 2005: Thu Jul 14 21:53:04 CEST
2005: 7335350857 (Uhlenbrock digital R�ckmeldemodul
63340) - Cancelling snipe. (1)
Thu Jul 14 21:53:06 CEST 2005: Done getting the sign in
cookie.
---pins---
In spite of all this text, the snipe must have worked
since I won the auction... ;-)

Besides: any chance to work with non-ASCII characters
in an UTF-8 environment?

Regards,
Werner

Discussion

  • Werner Flamme

    Werner Flamme - 2005-07-14
    • priority: 5 --> 3
     
  • Morgan Schweers

    Morgan Schweers - 2007-03-18
    • priority: 3 --> 4
     
  • Morgan Schweers

    Morgan Schweers - 2007-03-18

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=19745
    Originator: NO

    Greetings,
    Bugs filed before 1.0 and bugs without responders are being juggled in terms of priority (9 is highest priority). I'm raising bugs filed with a submitter, post-1.0 to P6. Bugs which are filed post-1.0, but without a submitter are P5. Before 1.0 bugs with a submitter are becoming P4, and pre-1.0 bugs without a submitter name become P3.

    If the bug is still relevant, and has a watcher (i.e. you got notified when I changed this bug), feel free to bubble it back up again.

    Email addresses in bugs are great, but I can't always respond via email. Sometimes, especially for duplicate bugs, I use automated tools (like I'm doing right now) to change status on a large number of items at once.

    Thanks for your patience, while I try to pare back the bug list to what may actually still be in the program.

    -- Morgan Schweers, CyberFOX!

     

Log in to post a comment.