From: Robert V. <vo...@ct...> - 2008-05-25 20:56:19
|
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 21:25 +0000, D.B. Moore wrote: > Greetings, > > This'll be aways down the track, but if I raise this here > and now so I've got plenty of time to succumb under my > own workload.... ;-) This sort of posting from myself, should > always start with the words.... "And I was thinking.." > > Essentially, there are two ways to use Jazz++ with Linux. > > 1. As a desktop application -- this is how most people will use it > > 2. As a dedicated DAW and part of a performer's working 'kit'. > > ....I mean, it's -possible-, right? Probably nobody is doing it, > they're buying dedicated DAW hardwares if they want this > sort of thing today - and they're expensive MIDI boxes as > well I might add. It just occurs to me that ix86 hardware has > come a long way, and now that SSD technology is going > ahead, a truly 'portable' construct is even more realistic. > > Form a mental picture -- let's say mini-ITX mainboard @ 1.5gHz > with 1gb+ of RAM and one kind or another MIDI/synth sound > card in the slot (there is only one slot). The OS is optimized to > the existent hardware makeup, and made as latency low as > possible. You would use a solid-state harddrive if you could, > but anything will do for now... > > Jazz++ is not desktop app here - so you don't get a traditional > window-manager facade. I would probably choose 'PicoGUI' > with a customized configuration to fit the purpose. If the fbdev > proved to be quicker at this than a video xserver, I'd use fb. > The navigation would be by hotkeys linked to F1--F12, for instance > the Jazz++ GUI would be fullscreen at F1, F2 might hold JACK > panels, F3 qsynth panels, F4 perhaps AMS panels....and so on. > You still of course have keybd&mouse to do stuff with on each > screen. The way things are with this hardware, it might prove to > be a lot less costly, and just as performant as professional MIDI > equipment of the same capabilities...IMHO anyway.. > > Like I say though, this would be on the>> other>> side of the > immediate happy future, but I'm interested to know what people > think about the idea -now-, so I can plan time for this in the > future....(if anyone's interested of course ;-). > > > Regards, > > > Donald B > Hi all, What I look forward to is a multi-core 64 bit processor that has at least a 3GHz clock and fast components. 64 bit addressing should enhance audio processing considerably. It could be in a full-size desktop case because it still fits easily into a small automobile. That, properly decked out with software, a smart connector, a good controller keyboard, and good speakers should be all you would want for excellent music. Any chance that Jazz++ could go to 64 bit mode ? Bob |