From: Pete S. <pst...@gm...> - 2008-05-15 18:21:49
|
DM = D.B. Moore DM>> Pete, here's my proposal for the majority of DM>> content for the bug reports webpage. As opposed DM>> to simple editing and correcting of existing DM>> content, this is new content submitted for your DM>> approval. Please review (holding in mind certain DM>> points detailed below), and deal with it as you DM>> see fit. DM> Doh!! Take me outside and shoot me!! DM> DM> I forgot to mention that this patch also contains DM> draft text meant for the documentation part of the DM> website....(my only excuse is re-quoting the famous DM> passage "it was late, I was tied, and just before DM> my head hit the keyboard..") I can relate to that ;-) DM> That content maybe incomplete, but it gives you DM> the idea of where I'm headed. DM> DM> First draft means that though - corrections expected, DM> and I can re-diff the patch in two parts if you want. DM>> There are things missing/omitted from this draft DM>> that need be addressed. Exampled paths are relative DM>> to linux, as are some of the command sequences. DM>> DM>> *Add Windows and Mac paths relative to examples.as DM>> required DM>> *Include any Windows and Mac specific commands or DM>> methodology if required DM>> DM>> See attached file :- htdocs-bugreports-instructions.patch.gz DM>> DM>> **BE WARNED** -- although the formatting output looked DM>> fine here, I noticed the patch looked a little strange... DM>> almost like my CR turned itself off. Too tired to deal DM>> with that now - supplied as a patch with a warning that DM>> WYS is not nearly always WYG.... DM>> DM>> ...And of course, to everyone else here - have a look at DM>> the content, and see what you think. Anything missing? DM>> Things I shouldn't have said or ought to have said? DM>> I'm sure everyone knows the drill, and understands DM>> criticism both good and/or bad is expected and always DM>> welcome. I didn't review the content, but I did apply it. It's up on the web site and committed in SVN... Thanks, Pete |