Re: [jazzplusplus-devel] Jazz++ Development Revival

[Pete S. <pst...@ve...>]

DF = Dave Fancella
DF>> Sort of.  Basically, I've gone to Qt, since
DF>> Qt got its GPL release on Windows and I've
DF>> no intention of walking the line of insanity
DF>> that underlies wxwidgets. ;)

KC = Kevin Cosgrove
KC> Qt4 would be my preference as it seems much
KC> more widely accepted cross-platform than does
KC> wxwidgets. wxw used to be a good cross-platform
KC> alternative, but it's been very hard to keep
KC> applications in step with that kit's
KC> incompatible changes between versions.  Qt used
KC> to be pretty awful too, but I think they're
KC> better than they used to be.  But, that's just
KC> my opinion.

I'm only interested in a wxWidgets version, but I understand where you 
guys are coming from.  I guess we could attempt to separate GUI code as 
much as possible and have separate Qt and wx GUI ports.

Maybe you guys are indirectly suggesting that I fork Jazz++ if I want to 
continue with wxWidgets development?  I'd be OK with that.  Just let me 
know.

Pete