Re: [jazzplusplus-devel] Re: wx 2.5.1?

[joakim v. <jo...@ve...>]

Dave Fancella wrote:

>On Saturday 10 April 2004 04:32 am, joakim verona wrote:
>  
>
>>Anyway, a tidbit of information for you, there is a "no sequencer for
>>gtk availabel" on lad right now.
>>    
>>
>
>I'm sure there's a Qt/GTK flamewar in there somewhere about artistic ability 
>and competence...  If I were to add to the discussion, all I'd be able to add 
>is that all the Qt sequencers we do have are suffering from a combination of 
>feature creep and bug overload.  :(  I'm having a hard time believing 
>RoseGarden will ever be stable again.  Heh.
>
>So, any of them willing to come over and help?  ;)
>  
>
Well, since the thread has now escalated into flame-armageddon,
I thought I'd wait until the dust has settled a bit :-P

But I agree with you concerns. A sequencer doesnt necessarily
have to be lacking in features, but the features present should be 
sequencer features.

I cant find a sequencer with good scripting support for instance, which 
I really feel
would be very useful(like the csound people do for instance, building 
songs with python scripts)

This is a feature I would like to build using, for instance Swig, to 
generate wrappers around
the Jazzpp midi track classes to use within python, ruby, or whatever, 
scripts.

Cheers,
/Joakim

>Dave
>
>  
>