From: D.B. M. <db...@ho...> - 2008-05-20 02:44:21
|
Greetings, I've finished the above topic, however before I post the patch it's ...question time... I don't really want to include the details of getting/building tex2rtf from svn, or how to build it from a *full* svn checkout of the Jazz++ svn source. My reasoning is; 1. tex2rtf doesn't rely on the custom wxWidgets build 2. tex2rtf in the Jazz++ svn is currently 'stable' and not changing. 3. tex2rtf is a FINE utility everyone should install anyway ;-) Of course, you know me....I've got no objections to actually writing out the svn based instructions to tex2rtf, and how to build / install it in parallel with the Jazz++ svn tree...however the current tex2rtf doesn't need be 'isolated' from the system makeup like custom-wx & Jazz++ parts do....ostensibly it can go straight into /usr/bin and not cause any problems AFAICT. I'm just trying to make things easy and uncomplicated for that userbase out there - tex2rtf build/install is a doddle compared to a Jazz++ svn build of tex2rtf. However, the 'simple' build of tex2rtf really requires a tex2rtf source tarball being available to avoid 2 svn checkouts, or a complete Jazz++ svn checkout, and a whole lot of explaining.... Let me know what the consensus is here please, and the patch will surely follow.... Regards, Donald B. _________________________________________________________________ Are you paid what you're worth? Find out: SEEK Salary Centre http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fcareer%2Dresources%2Fsalary%2Dcentre%2F%3Ftracking%3Dsk%3Ahet%3Asc%3Anine%3A0%3Ahot%3Atext&_t=764565661&_r=OCT07_endtext_salary&_m=EXT |
From: Pete S. <pst...@gm...> - 2008-05-20 14:15:03
|
DM = D.B. Moore DM> I've finished the above topic, however before DM> I post the patch it's ...question time... DM> DM> I don't really want to include the details of DM> getting/building tex2rtf from svn, or how to DM> build it from a *full* svn checkout of the DM> Jazz++ svn source. My reasoning is; DM> DM> 1. tex2rtf doesn't rely on the custom wxWidgets DM> build I'm sorry I mislead you in an earlier post, but it does. The version currently in the wxWidgets' Subversion repository doesn't... A. wxWidgets Subversion tex2rtf - can build against a stock version of the wxWidgets 2.8.7 build; *cannot* build against an STL enabled of the wxWidgets build like the one used with Jazz++. B. Jazz++ Subversion tex2rtf - can build against an STL enabled of the wxWidgets build like the one used with Jazz++; *cannot* build against a stock version of the wxWidgets 2.8.7 build. Either version can be used to process our jazz.tex file. DM> 2. tex2rtf in the Jazz++ svn is currently 'stable' DM> and not changing. DM> 3. tex2rtf is a FINE utility everyone should install DM> anyway ;-) DM> DM> Of course, you know me....I've got no objections to DM> actually writing out the svn based instructions to DM> tex2rtf, and how to build / install it in parallel DM> with the Jazz++ svn tree...however the current DM> tex2rtf doesn't need be 'isolated' from the system DM> makeup like custom-wx & Jazz++ parts do....ostensibly DM> it can go straight into /usr/bin and not cause any DM> problems AFAICT. DM> DM> I'm just trying to make things easy and uncomplicated DM> for that userbase out there - tex2rtf build/install DM> is a doddle compared to a Jazz++ svn build of tex2rtf. DM> However, the 'simple' build of tex2rtf really requires DM> a tex2rtf source tarball being available to avoid 2 svn DM> checkouts, or a complete Jazz++ svn checkout, and a DM> whole lot of explaining.... Let me work on that... DM> Let me know what the consensus is here please, DM> and the patch will surely follow.... I just wanted to explain that the version in our subversion does require wxWidgets to be built using our STL enabled build. Pete |
From: D.B. M. <db...@ho...> - 2008-05-20 16:23:11
|
Greets, ---------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:15:01 -0700 > Subject: Re: [jazzplusplus-devel] tex2rtf build instructions done...but... > > DM = D.B. Moore > DM> I've finished the above topic, however before > DM> I post the patch it's ...question time... > DM> > DM> I don't really want to include the details of > DM> getting/building tex2rtf from svn, or how to > DM> build it from a *full* svn checkout of the > DM> Jazz++ svn source. My reasoning is; > DM> > DM> 1. tex2rtf doesn't rely on the custom wxWidgets > DM> build > > I'm sorry I mislead you in an earlier post, but it does. The version > currently in the wxWidgets' Subversion repository doesn't... > > A. wxWidgets Subversion tex2rtf - can build against a stock version of > the wxWidgets 2.8.7 build; *cannot* build against an STL enabled of the > wxWidgets build like the one used with Jazz++. > > B. Jazz++ Subversion tex2rtf - can build against an STL enabled of the > wxWidgets build like the one used with Jazz++; *cannot* build against a > stock version of the wxWidgets 2.8.7 build. > > Either version can be used to process our jazz.tex file. > Ahh!....I see, no problem... > DM> 2. tex2rtf in the Jazz++ svn is currently 'stable' > DM> and not changing. > DM> 3. tex2rtf is a FINE utility everyone should install > DM> anyway ;-) > DM> > DM> Of course, you know me....I've got no objections to > DM> actually writing out the svn based instructions to > DM> tex2rtf, and how to build / install it in parallel > DM> with the Jazz++ svn tree...however the current > DM> tex2rtf doesn't need be 'isolated' from the system > DM> makeup like custom-wx & Jazz++ parts do....ostensibly > DM> it can go straight into /usr/bin and not cause any > DM> problems AFAICT. > DM> > DM> I'm just trying to make things easy and uncomplicated > DM> for that userbase out there - tex2rtf build/install > DM> is a doddle compared to a Jazz++ svn build of tex2rtf. > DM> However, the 'simple' build of tex2rtf really requires > DM> a tex2rtf source tarball being available to avoid 2 svn > DM> checkouts, or a complete Jazz++ svn checkout, and a > DM> whole lot of explaining.... > > Let me work on that... > > DM> Let me know what the consensus is here please, > DM> and the patch will surely follow.... > > I just wanted to explain that the version in our subversion does require > wxWidgets to be built using our STL enabled build. > Yep, no problems, no harm done....I think we both understand how I ended posting this query.. I'll rework the wording appropriately, and delay posting until you work out the little wrinkle... Regards, Donald B _________________________________________________________________ It's simple! Sell your car for just $30 at CarPoint.com.au http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fsecure%2Dau%2Eimrworldwide%2Ecom%2Fcgi%2Dbin%2Fa%2Fci%5F450304%2Fet%5F2%2Fcg%5F801459%2Fpi%5F1004813%2Fai%5F859641&_t=762955845&_r=tig_OCT07&_m=EXT |