From: Stefaan D. <st...@ya...> - 2002-07-31 06:55:34
|
Regarding the cache management in a pool mngr I already added my comment on this. Disatvange a lot of memory use for caching of those resultsets. As to comment of Adrian I completely agree. A pool mngr on itself is already a variant of a caching type. Altough regarding his request of a database caching utility I don't agree. Currently there is a caching manager available. This utility has the possibility to cache any types of object including resultsets. So a simple caching tool is already sufficient enough. Maybe this is a confusion to the naming of Adrian by the database caching. Could have some explanation of adrian? You did not start a flame ware here. :-) Cause as you I have also my opinion about this caching. This is not the best solution regarding to performance in the long run. Please comment!! Stefaan ===== Stefaan Delanghe ICQ: 110055343 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com |