From: Stefaan D. <st...@ya...> - 2002-07-30 22:10:40
|
I have some serious thought about caching resultset. How large a cache of resultset can be depends on the transactions which must be executed. If for example it is usefull to cache 50 resultsets for one application and another demands about a 100 caching resultsets. These demands could go up very fast. The reason to point this out is that caching resultsets is only usefull in situations where the retriction clause is not to restrictive (as pointed out by Isabelle). This means that a resultset that could be cached would take alot of memory space on a application server. As in accumulation of the above, there could be litterly put houndreds of resultsets in the cache which leads to memory overloading of the server. One possibility to this could be restricting the cache to a certain amount of memory which seems very far fetched to me. A pool manager should be capable of turning on any kind of machine powerfull or not. Your opinion? Stefaan ===== Stefaan Delanghe ICQ: 110055343 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com |