Menu

PPC or Intel version?

2007-04-18
2013-04-16
  • memyselfandi

    memyselfandi - 2007-04-18

    The Readme.txt says:

    "If your Mozilla.org browser is old enough not to work with universal binary plugins, you will need to use the PPC-binary copies of these files."

    What if your browser is updated, but your processor is PPC-only? (I have a first-generation iMac G5.)

    Which plugins (Intel or PPC) would be better, performance and/or stability-wise, in this situation?

     
    • Steven Michaud

      Steven Michaud - 2007-04-18

      The Java Embedding Plugin's PPC and Intel binaries are compiled from
      the same source code, so they should perform identically.  (A
      "universal binary" is just a package that contains individual binaries
      for more than one platform.)  Furthermore, only the appropriate binary
      gets used on a particular platform (PPC or Intel) -- so exactly the
      same binary gets run on a PPC Mac, whether it's from a "universal"
      "package" or a PPC-only "package".

      Be aware that (as the Readme also says) current versions of the Mac
      distros of Mozilla.org browsers all bundle a recent version of the
      Java Embedding Plugin.  There's no point in changing this unless a
      more recent version of the Java Embedding Plugin has become available
      (one that isn't yet bundled with a release version of any Mozilla.org
      browser).  The Readme tells you how to upgrade the bundled JEP to a
      newer version.

      You can see which JEP version you're running by entering
      "about:plugins" in the location bar (you may need to scroll down a
      bit).

       

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.