From: Mateusz U. <mat...@gm...> - 2008-11-11 20:54:46
|
Hi, In my project (implementing java.util.concurrent) I've encountered a problem. We have one example that runs ReentrantLock.lock()/unlock() in few concurrent threads, we use this to test our performance against code from original SDK. When we want to test code from SDK we need to change the names of our classes, for example JPF_java_util_concurrent_locks_ReentrantLock to JPF_java_util_concurrent_locks_ReentrantLock2. We could avoid this by setting appropriate vm.peer.packages but the problem is that our peer classes are in gov.nasa.jpf.jvm package which is always included. One thing that we can do is to change the package from gov.nasa.jpf.jvm but it seems that my code will not be complaint with JPF coding conventions. Is there a another solution for that ? Yours sincerely Mateusz Ujma - GSoC student |