From: John P. <jp...@go...> - 2008-04-03 20:43:50
|
Hi Taehoon, Do you have a test case that demonstrates the failure? John I saw your JPF GSoC application. We have only started to review them... John On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Taehoon Lee <ta...@kg...> wrote: > > As you can see at subject, While revision 795 does not generate test > input correctly, Revision 794 does generate test input correctly. > I want to modify JPF to implement additional functionality in > extension/Symbc. > Could you tell me whether I work on revision 795 or work on revision 794 > or wait until revision 796? > > My research interesting is software model checking & automatic test case > generation > > In JavaPathFinder Summer of Code projects > "Extend symbolic execution framework (symbc) to handling input arrays > and data structures (by using "generalized symbolic execution"" is very > interesting. > > I would like to try this. > I'm very appreciate if you give a some comment > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------ > Taehoon Lee > > Ph.D candidate > Department of Computer Science > Kyonggi University > San94-6, Yiui-dong, Yongtong-gu, Suwon-si, 442-760, South Korea > TEL: +82-11-9932-2732 > EMAIL: ta...@kg... > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Javapathfinder-devel mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javapathfinder-devel > |