[Javamatch-cvs] javamatch/docs/website javamatch.xml,1.11,1.12
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
iterson
From: Walter v. I. <it...@us...> - 2004-09-20 08:25:54
|
Update of /cvsroot/javamatch/javamatch/docs/website In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv2618/docs/website Modified Files: javamatch.xml Log Message: Added (unoptimized) JDO implementation Index: javamatch.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/javamatch/javamatch/docs/website/javamatch.xml,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -C2 -d -r1.11 -r1.12 *** javamatch.xml 14 Sep 2004 13:42:34 -0000 1.11 --- javamatch.xml 20 Sep 2004 08:25:45 -0000 1.12 *************** *** 460,463 **** --- 460,476 ---- JavaMatch works in combination with such storage mechanisms. </p> + <h2>JDO</h2> + <p class="intro"><a href="http://www.jdocentral.com">JDO</a>, the standard for + transparent object persistence, enables you to match in databases. JDO has a + query language, JDOQL. This language can be used to improve JavaMatch's + performance in two different ways: + </p> + <ul> + <li>Translate the subqueries into JDOQL, to reduce the amount of objects + that are iterated during the matching. This can only be done for those queries that + have a corresponding JDOQL operator</li> + <li>Use JDOQL's min and max operators for Minimum and Maximum-queries, to avoid + the pre-pass iteration. (This is a JDO 2.0 feature)</li> + </ul> <h2><a name="prevayler"/>Prevayler</h2> <p class="intro"> *************** *** 540,543 **** --- 553,557 ---- of the duration of all projects that had something to do with Java technology)</li> + <li><a href="integration.html#jdo">Performance optimizations</a> for JDO</li> </ul> </td> *************** *** 565,568 **** --- 579,586 ---- </tr> <tr> + <td>20040914</td> + <td>Restructured the web site</td> + </tr> + <tr> <td>20040913</td> <td>Replaced MatchList, OrList, AndList with QuerySet. Added RegexMatches, *************** *** 628,632 **** <li>LessThan(300) returns a complete mismatch both for 301 and 10000</li> <li>Range(10, 20) might have a "preferred" value at 16</li> - <li>Regular expression match queries</li> </ul> <h3>Web site</h3> --- 646,649 ---- |