rfe - doctype and comment support

Brought to you by: mdoar

#14 rfe - doctype and comment support

Milestone: Next_Release_(example)

Status: open-accepted

Owner: Matthew Doar

Labels: Interface Improvements (example) (4)

Priority: 5

Updated: 2002-06-11

Created: 2002-01-29

Creator: Anonymous

Private: No

Changes in sgml comment blocks <-- ... -->
and in initial <DOCTYPE> declarations should be
excluded from the changed text summaries.

Discussion

Matthew Doar - 2002-01-29

assigned_to: nobody --> mdoar
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Matthew Doar - 2002-01-29

Logged In: YES
user_id=342267

Yes, I guess you're right, that would be helpful.

~Matt
doar@pobox.com

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Matthew Doar - 2002-06-11

status: open --> open-accepted
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Matthew Doar - 2002-06-11

Logged In: YES
user_id=342267

That would be a nice option.

~Matt

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Matthew Doar - 2002-09-06

Logged In: YES
user_id=342267

Darren Carlton <darren@bea.com> pointed out that Javadoc
package.html files may, in fact, be full HTML documents. To
avoid the <!doctype> elements etc appearing in the first
sentence of the package -level documentation, I changed
RootDocToXml.java to only use the text between the <body>
elements in a package.html file. This fix does not appear in
JDiff1.0.8. This fix only solves the issue for package.html
HTML, not the general issue of HTML comments.

~Matt
doar@pobox.com

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Log in to post a comment.