Re: [javaCompiler-users] [Fwd: Release of NativeJ (formerly known as javaCompiler) version 0.9]

[Marco T. <mt...@gm...>]

Hendy Irawan wrote:
> JNative ;-) :-P *LOL*

Sounds great. But I learned from my last mistake and asked Google:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jnative

Another one that is already taken :-(


thanks anyway
Marco


> On 11/15/06, Marco Trudel <mt...@gm...> wrote:
>> Hendy Irawan wrote:
>>> On 11/15/06, Marco Trudel <mt...@gm...> wrote:
>>>> Compared to NativeJ: You really prefer paying >= 1000$ and adding a huge
>>>> runtime library instead of paying 39$ and having a small self containing
>>>> executable?
>>> $39?
>>> It says:
>>> $49.95 for Standard Edition
>>> $89.95 for Professional Edition
>>> http://www.dobysoft.com/products/nativej/
>>>
>>> Urrr... on second thought, was that your product?
>> No. They stole the name "NativeJ" before I used it for my product ;-)
>> Unfortunately everyone gets now confused.
>>
>> The original NativeJ is only a Java Wrapper that creates an exe to
>> launch your app.
>> My NativeJ - which I really have to rename again - is a real Java to
>> native compiler that creates real binaries from Java Applications.
>>
>> Any suggestions on how to name my JavaCompiler/NativeJ? I have no
>> idea... NativeJ seemed cool and pretty specific. Unfortunately the other
>> company used it for their product although it doesn't do what the name
>> implies...
>>
>>
>> Marco
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> _______________________________________________
>> javaCompiler-users mailing list
>> jav...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javacompiler-users
>>
> 
>