Re: [javaCompiler-users] [Fwd: Release of NativeJ (formerly known as javaCompiler) version 0.9]

[Marco T. <mt...@gm...>]

Hendy Irawan wrote:
> On 11/15/06, Marco Trudel <mt...@gm...> wrote:
>> Compared to NativeJ: You really prefer paying >= 1000$ and adding a huge
>> runtime library instead of paying 39$ and having a small self containing
>> executable?
> $39?
> It says:
> $49.95 for Standard Edition
> $89.95 for Professional Edition
> http://www.dobysoft.com/products/nativej/
> 
> Urrr... on second thought, was that your product?

No. They stole the name "NativeJ" before I used it for my product ;-) 
Unfortunately everyone gets now confused.

The original NativeJ is only a Java Wrapper that creates an exe to 
launch your app.
My NativeJ - which I really have to rename again - is a real Java to 
native compiler that creates real binaries from Java Applications.

Any suggestions on how to name my JavaCompiler/NativeJ? I have no 
idea... NativeJ seemed cool and pretty specific. Unfortunately the other 
company used it for their product although it doesn't do what the name 
implies...


Marco