Re: [javaCompiler-users] cannot compile specific jars

[Marco T. <mt...@gm...>]

praveen bharath wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to create a swing application that uses
> commons-logging.jar. This is failing and when I tried
> to create a jar object for this commons-logging.jar I
> am getting the following error. I am new to GCJ and
> JavaCompiler and greatly appreciate your help in this
> regard.
> 
> creating Copy of commons-logging-win.jar.o
> - Java 1.5 preprocessing: Copy of commons-logging.jar
> 	[RetroWeaver] Processing 17 classe(s)
> 	Exception in thread "main"
> com.rc.retroweaver.RetroWeaverException: Weaving
> failed
> 	   at 0x5dd538(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x47104e(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x475aae(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x475ad5(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x475c2b(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x475c5b(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x4158b1(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x41986b(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x66692c(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x543337(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x560ae0(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x46fa00(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x46fb62(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x46fb97(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x401308(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x401233(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x401284(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x7c816fd3(Unknown Source)
> 	Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: compressed
> size was 1280, but I expected 2816
> 	   at 0x5dd538(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x47104e(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x475aae(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x476354(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x4a1884(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x512364(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x512dad(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x512fc0(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x5198c4(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x411979(Unknown Source)
> 	   at 0x4197b4(Unknown Source)
> 	   ...10 more
> 
> failed...

Ok, multiple things:
- Which version of JavaCompiler are you using? Please update...
- I don't think you have to preprocess commons-logging.jar.
- Swing will most probably not work
- logging is already in GCJ. I don't know if it is in a javaCompiler 
release or if it was imported later. Just mentioning it because you 
might run into "multiple definitions of ..." problems.


Marco