Re: [javaCompiler-users] Win32 appearance enhancement
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
soapy
From: Marco T. <mt...@gm...> - 2006-10-10 21:14:20
|
M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote: > Marco Trudel wrote: >> Check that thread: >> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/platform-swt-dev/msg05063.html >> > this thread talking about eclipse not about native things ! :-\ There's no difference in this case my friend. >> I don't know what a manifest is doing exactly. > manifest do great appearance for Win32 apps jut like GTK+ in Linux > >> Are there different >> settings possible? If yes, then the SWT manifest doesn't exactly do what >> you want, you'll have to handle that yourself. >> If no, then you're not using SWT 3.2 ;-) > I'm sure that I'm using latest SWT version cuz I've downloaded it form > 10 minutes ! :-P Stupid question: Did you update the SWT version from javaCompiler too? If not, there you have the problem... > i think you couldn't understand what i mean, so in the attachment file a > small swt project i've compiled it by javaCompiler it shown what > manifest doing . the result so different (ugly appearance without manifest). I think you don't understand that javaCompiler doesn't do anything else than use SWT 3.139. > For that i suggest to do that in the next version of javaCompiler : > include standard manifest file into this path javaCompiler\ressources, > when the user want to build Win32 app javaCompiler copy this standard > file to the path of compiled app and then rename manifest file to the > app name. Nope, SWT is doing this already ;-) You just have to be really 100% absolutely sure you use SWT 3.2... Really completely fully fully 100% completly sure... Fully... Marco |