Re: [javaCompiler-users] aUPM compiling !

[Marco T. <mt...@gm...>]

M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote:
> Marco Trudel wrote:
>> Dude, completly encrypted website... Where's the dectrypt to english, 
>> german or - if it really has to be - french link? :-)
>>   
> this not encrypted site it has windows-1256 encoding :-P
> http://www.hali-sy.net/bashir/index.php?entry=entry060721-235826

:-)


>> So you've an AWT or Swing application... Read the help:
>> - Create managed AWT or Swing application project
>> GCJ doesn't support AWT/Swing for all plattforms (only for Linux). With 
>> this kind of project, you can use it on all plattforms anyway. It 
>> internally maps AWT/Swing to SWT.
>>
>> But read this too:
>> http://javacompiler.mtsystems.ch/frame_faq.html
>>   
> i need to build native application >:o  , can you try to build native 
> one by yourself .... please .
> 
> i tried to make exe file from java application by using "launch4j" but 
> it's need JVM, can you help me to solve this problem cuz i cann't change 
> GUI library for all my projects from swing to SWT (although i love SWT 
> very much) :-! , cuz most of them are complicated, aUPM is simple 
> project so i started to re-compile it to test the performance... i need 
> help :-[

You have five possibilities (sorted to what I would do):
1. migrate your applications to SWT
2. extend swingWT so that it supports your needed classes
3. fix gcj to run the gnu classpath AWT/Swing classes on static windows 
executables (if you're on it, linux static is broken too and windows 
shared would be nice too ;-))
4. bundle a jre with your application. ther're special setup tools for this
5. try excelsior JET (http://www.excelsior-usa.com/landing/jet-nc.html). 
It costs a lot and adds a huge runtime (even bigger than jre itself)

I can't think of anything else you could do. If 4 and 5 isn't an option, 
I think you should do 2. I can't do 1 to 3 for you, because they're too 
time consuming.


Marco