Re: [Javacad-develop] Building JCad
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
bachg
From: Shiva M. <shi...@ho...> - 2002-11-08 20:30:33
|
yes. Just JRE is sufficient to build it, unless you are enhancing JCad for your purposes. hmmm... about the licensing and legal things, i dont have a clue. May be Wang Tinghao(ba...@gn...), who authored JCad may have some feedback. I CC'ed the javacad mailing list too. Here is the actual license information about JRE1.4 (i guess u must have been already at this page http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/j2sdk-1_4_1-doc-license.html). -Shiva >From: Terry Hancock <ha...@an...> >Reply-To: ha...@an... >To: "Shiva Mantri" <shi...@ho...> >Subject: Re: [Javacad-develop] Building JCad >Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:52:59 -0800 > >On Friday 08 November 2002 05:32 am, Shiva Mantri wrote: > > Download JRE 1.4.1 from Sun >http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/download.html. > > Its is also free. JCad uses 1.4. It should fix the problem. > >Can you actually build it with only JRE, or do you need the >full JDK? > >Sun's JRE is "Non-Free" software coverred by the "Sun Community >Source License", which is non-Free. So I was going to try out the >Free alternatives, but my research leads me to believe you can't >run Java 1.4 based software on a Free platform (at least not >yet). (I didn't know that when I downloaded JCad). > >I might want to build it with the Sun JRE and check out what >it can do, but I wouldn't be able to use it in my project. I wonder >if there are any parts of the code that don't rely on the later >JRE features, so that it could perhaps be backported (but I >suspect that would be hard for a graphics-intensive program). > >Anyway, I'll experiment with it, and let you know what I >find out. > >Thanks, >Terry > >-- >Terry Hancock ( hancock at anansispaceworks.com ) >Anansi Spaceworks http://www.anansispaceworks.com _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |