I realize this may be closed as "unhelpful," but the load times and general ecosystem around sourceforge.net is pretty painful these days compared to GitHub.
Status: open Group: v1.0_(example) Created: Fri Mar 04, 2016 06:18 PM UTC by Michael Bolin Last Updated: Fri Mar 04, 2016 06:18 PM UTC Owner: nobody
I realize this may be closed as "unhelpful," but the load times and
general ecosystem around sourceforge.net is pretty painful these days
compared to GitHub.
I just tried it yesterday to share the code for an internal prototype and it worked great! My source was written in Java 7. The only thing that it broke on was the diamond operator:
Set<String> set = new HashSet<>();
But if I rewrote it as:
Set<String> set = new HashSet<String>();
then it was fine.
This is just for a design that I am sketching out and wanted to post internally to get feedback. I like this better than just putting the source in a private GitHub repo because it's actually hyperlinked.
I had additional comments that I wanted to solicit feedback on in a package-info.java file, which is why I opened ticket #4.
I'd consider moving the source code to github? Do you have any
experience of this ?
------ Original Message ------
From: "Michael Bolin" mbolin@users.sf.net
To: "[java2html:bugs]" 5@bugs.java2html.p.re.sf.net
Sent: 04/03/2016 18:47:32
Subject: [java2html:bugs] #5 Migrate to GitHub
I just tried it yesterday to share the code for an internal prototype
and it worked great! My source was written in Java 7. The only thing
that it broke on was the diamond operator:
Set<String> set = new HashSet<>();
But if I rewrote it as:
Set<String> set = new HashSet<String>();
then it was fine.
This is just for a design that I am sketching out and wanted to post
internally to get feedback. I like this better than just putting the
source in a private GitHub repo because it's actually hyperlinked.
I had additional comments that I wanted to solicit feedback on in a package-info.java file, which is why I opened ticket #4.
Status: open Group: v1.0_(example) Created: Fri Mar 04, 2016 06:18 PM UTC by Michael Bolin Last Updated: Fri Mar 04, 2016 06:18 PM UTC Owner: nobody
I realize this may be closed as "unhelpful," but the load times and
general ecosystem around sourceforge.net is pretty painful these days
compared to GitHub.
are you still using Java2HTML?
What version of Java source code do you run it on?
------ Original Message ------
From: "Michael Bolin" mbolin@users.sf.net
To: "Ticket 5" 5@bugs.java2html.p.re.sf.net
Sent: 04/03/2016 18:18:14
Subject: [java2html:bugs] #5 Migrate to GitHub
Related
Bugs: #5
I just tried it yesterday to share the code for an internal prototype and it worked great! My source was written in Java 7. The only thing that it broke on was the diamond operator:
Set<String> set = new HashSet<>();
But if I rewrote it as:
Set<String> set = new HashSet<String>();
then it was fine.
This is just for a design that I am sketching out and wanted to post internally to get feedback. I like this better than just putting the source in a private GitHub repo because it's actually hyperlinked.
I had additional comments that I wanted to solicit feedback on in a
package-info.javafile, which is why I opened ticket #4.I considered using http://www.java2html.de/, but it said:
"Does not use a strict grammar - so automatically generating hyperlinks for navigating source files is not possible."
which seemed like a severe limitation as the hyperlinks are the main reason I was interested in this.
I'd consider moving the source code to github? Do you have any
experience of this ?
------ Original Message ------
From: "Michael Bolin" mbolin@users.sf.net
To: "[java2html:bugs]" 5@bugs.java2html.p.re.sf.net
Sent: 04/03/2016 18:47:32
Subject: [java2html:bugs] #5 Migrate to GitHub
Related
Bugs: #5