Re: [Java-player-users] Problem with resource allocation while using Planner Interface

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Hello Salvatore,

I think the problem is with player, not javaclient. Have you posted
the question on pla...@li... list?

I´m quite lost with your problem, but maybe it´s related with the
mapfile parameter:

  resolution 0.032 # meters per pixel

It must be exactly the physical size of the world divided by the
number of pixels.

Sorry for not being more helpful

2011/9/28 Salvatore Famoso <ei...@gm...>:
> Hello everyone,
>
> i am using in 2 different threads, a Fiducial Detector, and a Planner Interface.
>
> The fiducial detector, gives me the id of the detected fiducial, as well as the position of the robot that detected it (position returned from the fiducial itself was less accurate, so i decided to use the one of the robot).
>
> This position, is then used by another robot as a goal in a PlannerInterface (robot has to move to the position the fiducial was detected).
>
> The second robot, has a fiducial detector running at the same time (All robots move in the environment, while detecting fiducials).
>
> The problem is, that while the fiducial is detected, and data is fed to the second robot's planner, the robot cannot get to the goal point.
>
> Although things seem to work properly, the robot at some point fails to adjust its speed, and carries out a course, usually crashing on to an obstacle.
>
> I have noticed that when this happens, my cpu usage reaches 100%, and in the terminal window where the planner configuration is run, i get an output like the following :
>
>
>
> warning : requested cell (1684,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1685,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1686,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1687,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1688,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1689,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1690,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1691,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1692,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1693,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1694,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1695,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1696,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1697,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1698,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1699,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1700,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1701,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1702,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1703,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1704,21) is offmap
> warning : requested cell (1705,21) is offmap
>
>
>
> In the java console, my output seems normal :
>
> Sep 28, 2011 9:01:40 AM javaclient3.MapInterface handleResponse
> WARNING: Data count doesn't match cells number: 2431 != 250000
> Sep 28, 2011 9:01:40 AM javaclient3.MapInterface handleResponse
> INFO: Map decompress: 250000 bytes
> Robot Navigation1@testPlatform New Goal : (0.6018865726369702,-6.377219609508479,-0.7258935634496316)
> Robot Navigation1@testPlatform map.isDataReady() true
> Robot Navigation1@testPlatform MapInfo = javaclient3.structures.map.PlayerMapInfo@9485d
> Robot Navigation1@testPlatform Map data ready!
> Robot Navigation1@testPlatform pmd.toString()javaclient3.structures.map.PlayerMapData@16dd2b6
> Robot Navigation1@testPlatform PlayerPlannerData = javaclient3.structures.planner.PlayerPlannerData@1e22a7e
> Robot Navigation1@testPlatform Still on path
>
>
> The map, amcl, wavefront and vfh configurations i use are the following :
>
>
> driver
> (
>  name "mapfile"
>  provides ["7000:map:0"]
>
>  filename "bitmaps/cave.png"
>  resolution 0.032 # meters per pixel
>  negate 0
>  origin [-16 -16 ] # real-world location of the bottom-left-hand corner of the map
> )
>
>
> driver
> (
>  name "amcl"
>  provides ["7000:localize:0" "7000:position2d:2"]
>  requires ["odometry::6665:position2d:0" "7000:laser:0" "laser::7000:map:0"]
>
>  odom_init 0
>
>  init_pose [-6.432 -5.895 0]
> )
>
>
> driver
> (
>  name "vfh"
>  provides ["7000:position2d:1"]
>  requires ["6665:position2d:0" "7000:laser:0"]
>
>  max_turnrate_0ms 90
>  max_turnrate_1ms 35
> )
>
> driver
> (
>  name "wavefront"
>  provides ["7000:planner:0"]
>  requires ["output::7000:position2d:1" "input::7000:position2d:2" "7000:map:0"]
>
>  safety_dist 0.4
>  distance_epsilon 1.0
>  angle_epsilon 10
>  alwayson 1
> )
>
>
> If anyone has an idea as to what causes the problem, you are welcome to give some insight.
> Thanks in advance
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Java-player-users mailing list
> Jav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-player-users
>