Re: [Java-gnome-developer] new Gentoo ebuilds for beta test
Brought to you by:
afcowie
From: Nicholas R. <ni...@mn...> - 2004-11-15 11:09:13
|
I just emerged java-gnome with your ebuilds. everything seemed to go fine and the emerge completed without errors. i haven't had a chance to test what was actually installed, but i would assume that it works. Just to note that i had to uninstall the previous 2.6 version before i could install the 2.8. the emerge was blocked by 2.6, but said it was blocked by 2.8. i had to look in you gnome-java ebuild to see that i needed to unmerge the 2.6 first. As an avid gentoo user, i'd just like to say thanks. when do you think these will make it into portage? also, what would be nice would be to have the 2.8 ebuilds in stable and some 2.9 ebuilds as arch masked. :-) nick On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 01:36 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote: > For those running Gentoo: > > I have created new ebuilds for libgtk-java, libgnome-java, etc and > replaced java-gnome with a meta package which depends on the various > pieces. > > I've tested it on two systems and I think I have the glitches knocked > out of the ebuild. As those on #gnome-java and #java-gnome who have been > listening to me bash away at this thing for the last couple days will > attest, things were massively complicated by the fact that java-gnome is > a fully autoconf'd gnome project. I've got a number of issues that I'll > fix in the various .in files during 2.9 > > If you're interested, I've put the ebuilds I wrote up at: > > http://www.operationaldynamics.com/reference/software/gentoo/ > > We'll get them into Portage shortly. > > If you want to try them, there's a tarball there if you want to put it > into your local overlay. > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge =dev-java/java-gnome-2.8.2 > > [You'll need to have your Gentoo system on GNOME 2.8 (which last I > checked is still masked, though I've been running it for a while now no > problems)] > > I have various programs which I'm working on which quite handily > exercise various bits of these packages, so I'm content that everything > builds, ends up in sensible places, and works. > > AfC > Sydney > -- |