Re: [Java-gnome-developer] (no subject)

[Luca De R. <pie...@li...>]

Hi all,
I' m sorry I haven't partecipated these days: unfortunately I have no
more access to a decent pc, I'm stuck with a P 200Mhz :((
I could use my girlfriend's one, but not everytime I'll need it.
This is bad cause it takes me a life to compile, so I think I couldn't
try the new build before Monday.
Also I'm on exam (guess what? uml & java, quite hard stuff for me).

Il mer, 2003-12-10 alle 14:41, Mark Howard ha scritto:
> cvs hacking - Let me know if it's ok & I'll get to it.
Ok. Modularity is good.

> tarballs - we'll release more of these after the cvs hackery
Ok: I think that an all-in-one tarball is vital: modularity is fine,
however the whole gnome is experiencing the difficulty to build gnome
itself, so garnome, etc... rised up. I've read in the past (on a
gnome-developer list) that they thought gnome was falling behind kde
also because building gnome is hard (at least it's impractical), and
because the haven't a way to distribute it quickly, like an all-in-one
tarball :)

> focus - work more on existing bindings while there are pending bug
>    reports, then look to new libraries
Agreed.

> version numbering - let me know if you disagree my proposal above
Ok. Have separate stable/unstable branches it's a benefit for users and
above all for us :)

> sourceforge - anyone second my proposal
Gnome.org
+ they have bugzilla.
+ we hope they update things faster (sf web interface is never updated).
+ it feels like it's a better place for java-gnome.(more official)
- I don't know how the do cvs acces and stuff like this and if they have
docs. But I think this isn't a problem at all.

Sf.net
+ Very popular repo.
+ They have a lot of services( compile farm etc..)
- There services aren't always reliable.

I think we should move to benefit from the use of e.g bugzilla, but
leave a sf project entry and maybe upload the tarballs there too.

-- 
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>