Re: [Java-gnome-developer] (no subject)

[Mark H. <mh...@ca...>]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 09:13:51AM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote:
> gnome should be stated as libgnome, libgnomeui, and libgnomecanvas 
> since they are all contained in our org.gnu.gnome package.
we're not going to be able to support libgnomecanvas are we?

> > CVS Hacking
> > -----------
> Are you sure this can be completed and tested in order to allow us
> time to make the necessary changes prior to the 22nd?
I've just downloaded the nightly cvs tarball and will start hacking
right away. The problem is that I don't have access to the cvs
repository directly - I will have to upload the new tarball and request
sourceforge admins to install it (this is what it says to do in their
docs).
If sourceforge is not ready in time, I can create the tarballs myself
easily enough for December 22nd. In fact, I would like to have a release
before that time - 0.9.0, to test the new build scripts, multiple
tarballs and such. Then we can release 0.9.1 to send to gnome. 

> I am in favor of this move but am concerned that we might not be
> able to get everything completed prior to the 22nd.  If we do intend
> to shoot for this date we should announce our intention on the bindings
> list.
Done.

> > Released Tarballs
This is what we should send to the gnome bindings team then, to go on
the modules list -- is it ok?
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/bindings/modules.html

> > tarball_name    (cvs modules included)
> > libglib-java    (glib)
> > libgtk-java     (gtk+, pango, atk)
> > libgnome-java   (libgnome, libgnomeui, libgnomecanvas)
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
										   I don't think we can
										   realistically include this.
> > libglade-java   (libglade)
Other bindings also available (soon)
> > [ libgtkhtml-java       (gtkhtml) ]
> > [ libgconf-java         (gconf)   ]
> > [ libvte-java           (vte)     ]
> > [ libgnomepanel-java (gnomepanel) ]

> > cvs hacking - Let me know if it's ok & I'll get to it
> I would say start now.  I just checked in some code so make sure
> you get the latest.
I've downloaded a nightly tarball, so will have to manually check all
changes from the last few days. I'm starting..

> Yes.  We will have more shared objects to load and finding the entry
> point for some of the libs might not be easy.
Good point. We also need to load e.g. libgnome-java-1.0 directly to
avoid problems

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca...