Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Editable_cells from gtk-demo cloned

[Mark H. <mh...@ca...>]

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:46:33PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> Now my question is about the structure of the project:
> Is it preferable to create a javagnomedemo (or something) package?
I'm not sure, TBH. My initial thoughts were to have this just as another
example, and so just have the toplevel name as the package name.
However, I now think it might be better to create this as a proper
application so that it will be compiled with the rest of java-gnome and
installed in binary packages as gtk-demo-java. This can then be used for
reference as gtk-demo presumably is. In such a case, it would probably
be better to have the full package structure. 

Jeff - do you have any thoughts about this.

While we're on this topic, it might also be a good time to rearrange
some of the examples in cvs. I think it would be much better if we make
it easer to compile and run them, without having to mess about with
classpath each time. Would an ant build file and a script to run the
demos be enough?

> Have you a suggestion for the main class naming?
Main.java ? Package gtk-demo-java
> Any further hint?
Try to follow the sources of gtk-demo, but using the java style. 
TextView and ButtonBoxes have already been done - they can be simply
copied.

> If you confirm these choices are right ones, I'll write down the
> JavaGnomeDemo main window, and add all the needed interfaces.
> Then integrating the existing examples will be a snap.
(Note you will probably find some bugs and unimplemented features in
java-gnome
)
> Let me know also if I should report the work in progress to the list,
> and post new code to be reviewed.
Yes please!
We can easily add it to cvs if you do that, or you may be able to get a
cvs account yourself. 

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca...