Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Some other minor issues

[Luca De R. <pie...@li...>]

Il gio, 2003-11-13 alle 16:19, Mark Howard ha scritto:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:23:07PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> > If there is the need of test app, I think we should work on cloning
> > gtk-demo. Are the incomplete test case classes intended as a start for
> > java-gnome-demo? 
> This is certainly something I'd like to see too. My implementations of
> test apps have deliberately been following this style - we just need to
> finish the others.

Fine.

> > I wish to help (as a said) but, since I can't compile
> > the test case, 
> The test directory hasn't been worked on since gtk1 work, AFAIK.
> > It seems to me that the the idea was to write java-gnome-demo starting
> > from the examples apps instead (TestGtk and others), is this true?
> > Because if it is, there is still a lot of stuff to be done, for example:
> > the button boxes example should use stock icons. Does it make sense if I
> > do a patch for this?
> This does use stock buttons (examples/gtk/buttonbox/ButtonBoxes). 
> Are you looking at a different example?

Ooops... yes, actually. I was looking at the buttonboxes in the TestGtk
app.
Could we assume that TestGtk is the foundation for java-gnome-demo main window ?
If it's true, we have to fix the buttonboxes there too.
Another thing would be using a TreeView in the main TestGtk window
instead of buttons (like gtk-demo does).
If I'm going to write the source viewer with syntax highlighting, should
I make a patch against TestGtk directly?

> Please do make patches - for any examples where you think anything needs
> doing. We will review all patches carefully. 
> 
> > Also in the gtk-demo there is a source viewer with syntax highlighting,
> > do we have to implement that? It sounds interesting :)
> With the little work I've done on the text widgets, it should be quite
> simple.

Thanks,
Luca.
-- 
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>