RE: [Java-gnome-developer] Some other minor issues

[Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...>]

This is quite strange.  I took you attached example and
it ran fine without problems.  Also, I have no problems
with the toolbar.  Is it possible that you have an 
older version of the shared object in your path?

-Jeff

> Il mer, 2003-11-12 alle 19:24, Luca De Rugeriis ha scritto:
> > Il mer, 2003-11-12 alle 15:10, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto:
> > > >      1. If you use the AppBar, all is fine except that, 
> if you also
> > > >         install menu hints, instead of the right hint 
> you will end up
> > > >         with a lot of libgnomeui information strings 
> sticked in the
> > > >         appbar, but only when the mouse hovers the main menu 
> > > > items i.e.
> > > >         file, edit,...etc. (If you want I can explain myself 
> > > > better with
> > > >         a couple of pics).
> > > 
> > > This seems to be working now.  I believe this was addressed with
> > > the reworking of String arrays.  Please try again and let me know
> > > if you are still having problems.
> Nope. Unfortunately this is still present, I've attached my simple app
> (written while learning) to let you figure out precisely what happens:
> simply hover the main menu item (like edit, help) with the 
> mouse, you'll
> see messed strings pushed in the appbar.
> This isn't a major bug cause the only real advantage I've seen using
> AppBar instead of StatusBar is that i can app.flash(String s) 
> a message
> in the bar without have to write a thread. (and also use the
> progressbar).
> But at this stage, if you have an app menu and menu hints 
> installed, the
> AppBar is quite unusable :(
> 
> > > 
> > > >      2. It seems there is a couple of visible bug in the TestGtk
> > > >         application: when you click on the toolbar 
> button and on the
> > > >         handle box button the program crash with signal 
> 11 with a long
> > > >         trace. I think these traces are easily 
> reproducible, but again
> > > >         if you want I will post them.
> > > 
> > > The fix for this problem is in cvs.
> The handlebox is fixed, but the toolbar still has quirks:
> the first time I've launched it, it showed up but it had generic gtk
> icons(the ones with the white sheet with a red cross), and on 
> stderr it
> complaints about something like an appendWidget method failed, but I
> can't tell more precisely cause right now the toolbar doesn't show out
> anymore! (strange)
> 
> > > 
> > > >      3. In the TreeExample app, it cannot render a 
> pixbuf on the tree.
> > > >         It complaints with this message:
> > > 
> > > This item will requrie further work.  I will look into it over
> > > the next few days.
> Ok :)
> 
> > > 
> > > > And finally, altought maybe it isn't a bug report, can we 
> > > > have chance to
> > > > see the MessageDialog class finished?
> > > 
> > > This class is already complete.  I just added an example of
> > > its' usage to TestGTK.  Check out cvs.
> Silly me! I really was so dumb I thought it was incomplete.
> Actually it's nice and functional :)
> 
> About the example apps: not that I care particularly about them, I
> assumed that there were bugs in the java-gnome library rather than in
> the example apps themselves, so if these bugs above are present only
> because they are example apps'  bugs, you can safely leave 
> them there :)
> 
> If there is the need of test app, I think we should work on cloning
> gtk-demo. Are the incomplete test case classes intended as a start for
> java-gnome-demo? I wish to help (as a said) but, since I can't compile
> the test case, I'm just wondering if the java-gnome-demo work is going
> to start from the test case apps.
> It seems to me that the the idea was to write java-gnome-demo starting
> from the examples apps instead (TestGtk and others), is this true?
> Because if it is, there is still a lot of stuff to be done, 
> for example:
> the button boxes example should use stock icons. Does it make 
> sense if I
> do a patch for this?
> Also in the gtk-demo there is a source viewer with syntax 
> highlighting,
> do we have to implement that? It sounds interesting :)
> Comments to my little app (my first one :) are also appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Luca.
> 
> -- 
> Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>
>