Re: [java-gnome-hackers] FW: A GNOME Bindings release set?

[Mark H. <mh...@ti...>]

Another message that bounced, thanks to freeserve spam avoidance (they
eat all emails going through the network - I'm not even using their smtp
servers). I think my emails should be working right now.

> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:44:34PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> > Il mer, 2003-12-03 alle 15:20, Mark Howard ha scritto:
> > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:15:42PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> > > > in Fedora. The only question is: how distributions could cope with a
> > > > package the requires a JDK to compile? 
> > > > Mark, Debian community thoughts on this?
> > > 
> > > Java-gnome is already in Debian -- I maintain the packages myself.
> > > Compilation is done with jikes and other free tools. (I also have a
> > > wrapper script for the ant parts, but few distributions consider ant to
> > > be non-free)
> > Thanks, it means that I have to end up with an Ant, Jikes and Java-Gnome
> > package proposal. I don't know what Fedora's guys think aobut Ant, I
> > have to ask. AFAIK we can't compile without Ant, right?
> Ant depends on sun jvm per default. A few ppl have made it work with
> free tools, but the debian packages haven't done so and hence it isn't
> in debian main. I'm using a little script to replace the ant
> functionality - it's quite simple.
> 
> > Does Java-gnome compiles with Jikes out of the box?
> yes.
> 
> If you want to take a look at the debian packaging scripts I'm using,
> they're available at packages.debian.org (java-gnome package, diff.gz
> file). This site is unfortunately down atm though.
> 
> -- 
>   .''`. Mark Howard
>  : :' :
>  `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
>    `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... 
> 

-- 
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com 
   `-   mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca...