Re: [Fwd: Re: [java-gnome-hackers] --with-gcj-compile]

[Jeffrey M. <ku...@zo...>]

I think it is essential that we support gcj.  I believe that the
classpath project (the class library used by gcj) will have a release
very shortly that will implement the majority of the 1.4 spec thanks
to a large number of patches from IBM.  I am not sure what version
of the jdk is currently supported by gcj but this should be our
minimum. 

On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 17:42, Tom Ball wrote:
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> 
> > From: VEROK Istvan <vi...@in...>
> > To: Tom Ball <Tom...@Su...>
> > Subject: Re: [java-gnome-hackers] --with-gcj-compile
> > Date: 04 Dec 2002 23:50:04 +0100
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Tom Ball wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm a big supporter of open software, but not obsolete software.  While
> > > gcj doesn't support Proxy (InvocationHandler is just an interface), it
> > > will have to soon or risk splitting the Java platform.  I suppose I
> > 
> > I just took a look at the GCC CVS, and they _do_ have
> > java.lang.reflect.Proxy support (whew!), it just doesn't yet seem to have
> > percolated down into the Debian packages I use, for some reason.
> > 
> > Istvan
> > 
> -- 
> Tom Ball <Tom...@Su...>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET 
> comprehensive development tool, built to increase your 
> productivity. Try a free online hosted session at:
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en
> _______________________________________________
> java-gnome-hackers mailing list
> jav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers
>