Re: [java-gnome-hackers] Connection strategy

[Jeffrey M. <ku...@zo...>]

Sorry for being so short and unclear.  What I was referring to was
the fact that the connect method of LibGlade uses the addEventHandler
method to connect a callback to any provided method and object as
long as they meet the signal callback signature.  What I would like
to see is for the libglade to bind callbacks to listeners in a
similar fashion to the remainder of the library.  At this point
I have no design in mind.

On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 16:29, Tom Ball wrote:
> > One of the areas that I would like to see changed in the libglade 
> > binding is the event handling.  As you can see from our 
> > bindings we have just changed over to a more "java like" 
> > event handling API.  libglade still wants to use the old 
> > signal_connect method.  As a result I have had to keep our 
> > old event handling structure public.
> 
> I don't find any explicit signal_connect references; would you please
> tell me what API I should avoid?  Better yet, rip out anything you don't
> want used (or print a deprecated warning when the function is called),
> and I'll work around it.  I'll be able to streamline connection once I
> know what areas to avoid.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> java-gnome-hackers mailing list
> jav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers
>