Re: [java-gnome-hackers] update and TODOs

[Sergio R. <ser...@hi...>]

I Like it. I will have the vte bindings at the end of this month. Also I
want to make the UML of all the bindings after working in vte.=20

El mar, 19-11-2002 a las 16:15, Jeffrey Morgan escribi=F3:
> I have been working on the Gnome classes over the past week.  I have most
> of the classes working.  I still have a couple of problems with the UIInf=
o
> implementation that I plan to address today.  Going forward I hope to
> add the event handling to the gnome package and thought about creating
> a org.gnu.gnome.event package similar to the gtk equivalent. =20
>=20
> I thought it might be a good idea to list all of the tasks that should=20
> be completed prior to our next release.  I would also like to take this
> one step further and define the future direction and goals of this projec=
t.
> I am including my spontaneous attempt to define the tasks and direction.
> I am sure I am missing some important tasks so please add additional=20
> tasks or comment on the ones I have listed.  Also, if you are working on=20
> one of these tasks or wish to work on a task let the team know so we=20
> don't duplicate efforts.
>=20
> As for the future direction, I have included my ideas below.  I would lik=
e=20
> for use to get on a schedule of having a release every couple of months. =
 My
> ultimate goal is to provide more than just a wrapper over native widgets.
> I hope to eventually provide an entire framework for developing Gnome
> applications.  I propose a target of having release 1.0 ready by late nex=
t=20
> summer.  I cannot achieve this goal without your help.  Let me know=20
> your thoughts.
>=20
>=20
> Major TODOs for next release
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
> 1) Complete the event handling for the gnome package - Jeff
> 2) Complete the implementation of ItemFactory in the gtk package
>    This should be implemented using a similar approach to the
>    UIInfo classes. - ?
> 3) Complete the vte implementation (Rubio, what is your estimate?)
> 4) Complete the glade updates (Tom, what is your estimate?)
> 5) Enhance the current examples to demonstrate a more complete usage
>    of the widgets.  We also need to write new examples to demonstrate
>    the new widgets in the libraries. - ?
> 6) Fix the delete event propagation - Jeff
> 7) Update the tutorial - Jeff
> 8) Update all remaining documentation. - ?
> 9) Translate the documentation into Spanish - Alberto
>=20
>=20
> Future direction
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> 0.8 - This is our first version that supports GTK/Gnome 2.  This is also =
a
> major rewrite of the bindings.
> In this release we provid a wrapper around the native libraries.
> 0.8.1 - Bug fixes, enhancements to the gnome canvas implementation,
> enhancements to the gdk
> drawing classes.
> 0.8.2 - Bug fixes, better gconf integration, enhancements to the atk and
> pango implementation
> 0.8.3 - Bug fixes, bonobo implementation, gnomeprint implementation
> 0.9 - First release of the framework
> 0.9.1 - Framework enhancements
> 0.9.2 - Framework enhancements
> 0.9.3 - Framework enhancements
> 1.0 - First production ready release of the bindings.  From this point
> forward we will maintain
> API stability.
>=20
> -Jeff
>=20
>=20
--=20
:: Rubio Jr. ::
ser...@hi...
http://rubiojr.dragon-lance.net

::  GrULLA   ::
http://grulla.hispalinux.es


" The number 1 tip for GTK+ programming is: =20

  - Don't use C; In my opinion, C is a library programming language
    not an app programming language. "
								=09
                                                  Owen Taylor.

 =20