Re: [java-gnome-hackers] Source and Target versions

[Serkan K. <se...@ge...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I might be sounding too "enterprise" but I don't think we should
enforce 7 unless there's a real valid reason. Not like "Go use the
latest version you fool". But I agree that we should opt out 5 since
Sun has EOLed it.

Regards,
Serkan

On 07/17/2012 04:47 AM, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 00:38 +0200, Serkan Kaba wrote:
>> I would immediately need a patch for Gentoo if we follow this
>> path. Build system must ensure that it builds bytecode targeted
>> for oldest version possible. If we don't supply these parameters
>> we can't guarantee that this is the case.
> 
> That's what I thought. We'll leave those two parameters in then.
> 
>> But this doesn't mean we can bump the oldest version we support
>> by changing these numbers.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> So should we say "Java 7 is minimum" now, or is someone going to
> say that we should be resting on 6?
> 
> AfC Sydney
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
> Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the
> latest in malware threats.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ java-gnome-hackers
> mailing list jav...@li... 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlALEpQACgkQRh6X64ivZaLHVwCfYxofY+Xc7t+LmDPOGGV1y72K
kcEAnAqc1KCOwAXFgjkv5U8HAz7qOcaL
=Qp0i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----