Re: [java-gnome-hackers] GtkBuilder branch
Brought to you by:
afcowie
From: Serkan K. <se...@ge...> - 2011-07-19 03:04:53
|
2011/6/18 Vreixo Formoso Lopes <met...@ya...>: > Hi all! > > I have created a branch with my approach to expose GtkBuilder, available at: > > http://research.operationaldynamics.com/bzr/java-gnome/hackers/vreixo/gtkbuilder/ > > > > I plan to expose GtkBuilder as an annotation-based way of creating user > interfaces, following the approach of Francho Bulgarelli to libglade, submitted > several years ago. In fact, my work is mainly an adaptation of Franco's > implementation, although I also plan to make some changes. I don't want > to follow with my discussion without first thank Franco for his huge > contribution. > > The work in my branch is still in a preliminary stage, but you can already > figure > > out the idea by looking at my code. Please download the branch and focus on > > org.gnome.gtk.Builder > > I have added a tiny demo application in doc/examples/builder, NotesDemo.java, > that shows the possibilities of an annotation-based approach. Further work will > address the signal connection by means of annotation, and many other things. > > I'm aware of the problems of GtkBuilder and similar approaches (that build user > interfaces with an external program and then load them from an XML file), > mainly related with the lack of type-safety (and note, however, that the > annotation-based approach reduces its impact by detecting the possible > problems at load time, without needing to execute all possible code paths). > > Anyway, this method for creating UI is very common in the java world (they > come to my mind web-related frameworks such as JSP/JSTL, Tapestry, > GWT's UiBinder, or the mobile Android platform with his layouts). Many > java developers use to work this way and, indeed, it has several advantages > too. > > I thus think we should offer support for this way of working in java-gnome, and > the annotation-based approach is, in my opinion, the best one. > I hope you take a look at the code and tell me your opinions about it, and any > idea that could improve it. I'll try to provide a good implementation of > GtkBuilder, making it easy for developers by means of the powerful capabilities > of the Java platform. But, at the same time, I'll try to reduce as much as > possible the limitations of the approach. > > If any of you have experience with GtkBuilder (I have not), please tell me what > are the things you want support for in java-gnome, but also the main problems > you've found when working with it, so we can address them the best possible > way. > > Thanks in advance, > > Best regards > Vreixo Formoso > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > java-gnome-hackers mailing list > jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers > I really like the idea of using dependency injection for ui object. well done. Regards, Serkan |